ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2017
What does it take to learn a word?
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not All Planes Have Propellers: Using Context Variability to Treat Word Learning in Late Talkers With the Vocabulary Acquisition and Usage for Late Talkers Protocol.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Trial
- Asymmetrical Effects of Language Mixing in Bilingual Children's Word Learning.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Signatures of cross-modal alignment in children's early concepts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Understanding preschoolers' word learning success in different scenarios: disambiguation meets statistical learning and eBook reading.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Phonological and Semantic Specialization in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children During Auditory Word Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- The Slow Development of Real-Time Processing: Spoken-Word Recognition as a Crucible for New Thinking About Language Acquisition and Language Disorders.Current directions in psychological science · 2022Article
- Effects of language mixing on bilingual children's word learning.Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Prior Exposure and Toddlers' Sleep-Related Memory for Novel Words.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Toward a Precision Science of Word Learning: Understanding Individual Vocabulary Pathways.Child development perspectives · 2021Article
- Language status at age 3: Group and individual prediction from vocabulary comprehension in the second year.Developmental psychology · 2019Article
- Symbolic flexibility during unsupervised word learning in children and adults.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2018Article
- Words affect visual perception by activating object shape representations.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Nature, Nurture or Interacting Developmental Systems? Endophenotypes for learning systems bridge genes, language and development.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2016Article
- Convergence and divergence in prediction from vocabulary and speed of word processing.Cognitive developmentArticle
- Little evidence for Fast Mapping (FM) in adults: A review and discussion.Cognitive neuroscienceReview
- Beyond the Bayley: Neurocognitive Assessments of Development During Infancy and Toddlerhood.Developmental neuropsychologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vocabulary learning is deceptively hard, but toddlers often make it look easy. Prior theories proposed that children's rapid acquisition of words is based on language-specific knowledge and constraints. In contrast, more recent work converges on the view that word learning proceeds via domain-general processes that are tuned to richly structured-not impoverished-input. We argue that new theoretical insights, coupled with methodological tools, have pushed the field toward an appreciation of simple, content-free processes working together as a system to support the acquisition of words. We illustrate this by considering three central phenomena of early language development: referential ambiguity, fast-mapping, and the vocabulary spurt. WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1421. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1421 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.