Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911297›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2017

Sample Size Estimation for Alzheimer's Disease Trials from Japanese ADNI Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Motonobu Fujishima, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Norihide Maikusa, Ryozo Kuwano, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Hiroshi Matsuda, Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI)

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The roles of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Motonobu FujishimaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi KawaguchiCenter for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Norihide MaikusaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryozo KuwanoBrain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Takeshi IwatsuboDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsudaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI)
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPGTx (United States) · USNiigata University · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the sample sizes required for clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-modifying treatments using atrophy measures from serial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the Japanese population.

objectiveThe primary objective of the present study was to estimate how large a sample size would be needed for future clinical trials for AD-modifying treatments in Japan using atrophy measures of the brain as a surrogate biomarker.

methodsSample sizes were estimated from the rates of change of the whole brain and hippocampus by the k-means normalized boundary shift integral (KN-BSI) and cognitive measures using the data of 537 Japanese Alzheimer's Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI) participants with a linear mixed-effects model. We also examined the potential use of ApoE status as a trial enrichment strategy.

resultsThe hippocampal atrophy rate required smaller sample sizes than cognitive measures of AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Inclusion of ApoE status reduced sample sizes for AD and MCI patients in the atrophy measures.

conclusionThese results show the potential use of longitudinal hippocampal atrophy measurement using automated image analysis as a progression biomarker and ApoE status as a trial enrichment strategy in a clinical trial of AD-modifying treatment in Japanese people.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSample SizeAgedAlzheimer DiseaseApolipoproteins EAtrophyBrainCognition DisordersFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJapanLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsApolipoproteins EAlzheimer’s diseaseapolipoprotein E ɛ4boundary shift integralbrain atrophyJ-ADNIsample size

Identifiers

PMID27911297
PMCPMC5240548
OpenAlexW2558161238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.