Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911223›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2017

Advances in capillary electrophoresis and the implications for drug discovery.

Claire M Ouimet, Cara I D'amico, Robert T Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Label-free methods for opticalPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2021
    Review
  8. Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claire M Ouimeta Department of Chemistry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , United States.
Cara I D'amicob Department of Pharmacology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , United States.
Robert T Kennedya Department of Chemistry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , United States.

Funding

High throughput mass spectrometry and electrophoresis assay systemsR01GM102236 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KENNEDY, ROBERT T · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany screening platforms are prone to assay interferences that can be avoided by directly measuring the target or enzymatic product. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) and microchip electrophoresis (MCE) have been applied in a variety of formats to drug discovery. CE provides direct detection of the product allowing for the identification of some forms of assay interference. The high efficiency, rapid separations, and low volume requirements make CE amenable to drug discovery. Areas covered: This article describes advances in capillary electrophoresis throughput, sample introduction, and target assays as they pertain to drug discovery and screening. Instrumental advances discussed include integrated droplet microfluidics platforms and multiplexed arrays. Applications of CE to assays of diverse drug discovery targets, including enzymes and affinity interactions are also described. Expert opinion: Current screening with CE does not fully take advantage of the throughputs or low sample volumes possible with CE and is most suitable as a secondary screening method or for screens that are inaccessible with more common platforms. With further development, droplet microfluidics coupled to MCE could take advantage of the low sample requirements by performing assays on the nanoliter scale at high throughput.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryElectrophoresis, CapillaryElectrophoresis, MicrochipHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMolecular Targeted TherapyCapillary electrophoresismicrochip electrophoresismicrofluidicsscreening

Identifiers

PMID27911223
PMCPMC5521262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.