ArticleScientific reports2016
Novel groups and unique distribution of phage phoH genes in paddy waters in northeast China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From bacterial predators to partners: phages in agriculture.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Genome Sequences of the First Phages InfectingMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Two Novel Genera of Jumbo Bacteriophages InfectingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Understanding and exploring the diversity of soil microorganisms in tea (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Genetic diversity of virus auxiliary metabolism genes associated with phosphorus metabolism in Napahai plateau wetland.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Viral community-wide auxiliary metabolic genes differ by lifestyles, habitats, and hosts.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Distribution of soil viruses across China and their potential role in phosphorous metabolism.Environmental microbiome · 2022Article
- The First Cbk-Like Phage InfectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Viral Abundance and Diversity of Production Fluids in Oil Reservoirs.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Soil Microbial Biogeography in a Changing World: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.mSystems · 2020Review
- BioprospectingViruses · 2020Article
- Article
- Survey of the bacteriophage phoH gene in wetland sediments in northeast China.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although bacteriophages are ubiquitous in various environments, their genetic diversity is primarily investigated in pelagic marine environments. Corresponding studies in terrestrial environments are few. In this study, we conducted the first survey of phage diversity in the paddy ecosystem by targeting a new viral biomarker gene, phoH. A total of 424 phoH sequences were obtained from four paddy waters generated from a pot experiment with different soils collected from open paddy fields in northeast China. The majority of phoH sequences in paddy waters were novel, with the highest identity of ≤70% with known phoH sequences. Four unique groups (Group α, Group β, Group γ and Group δ) and seven new subgroups (Group 2b, Group 3d, Group 3e, Group 6a, Group 6b, Group 6c and Group 6d) were formed exclusively with the clones from the paddy waters, suggesting novel phage phoH groups exist in the paddy ecosystem. Additionally, the distribution proportions of phoH clones in different groups varied among paddy water samples, suggesting the phage community in paddy fields is biogeographically distributed. Furthermore, non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis indicated that phage phoH assemblages in paddy waters were distinct from those in marine waters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.