Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27910868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Relationship between nanotopographical alignment and stem cell fate with live imaging and shape analysis.

Peter Newman, Jorge Luis Galenano Niño, Pamela Graney, Joselito M Razal, Andrew I Minett, João Ribas, Raquel Ovalle-Robles, Maté Biro, Hala Zreiqat

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Driving Cells with Light-Controlled Topographies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter NewmanBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Research Unit, School of Aeronautical Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Jorge Luis Galenano NiñoEMBL Australia node in Single Molecule Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Pamela GraneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Joselito M RazalInstitute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
Andrew I MinettLaboratory for Sustainable Technology, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
João RibasBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Raquel Ovalle-RoblesNano-Science &Technology Center, LINTEC of America Inc., Richardson, Texas 75081, USA.
Maté BiroEMBL Australia node in Single Molecule Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Hala ZreiqatBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Research Unit, School of Aeronautical Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUAustralian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering · AUDeakin University · AUDrexel University · USInnovation Research Center · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topography of a biomaterial regulates cellular interactions and determine stem cell fate. A complete understanding of how topographical properties affect cell behavior will allow the rational design of material surfaces that elicit specified biological functions once placed in the body. To this end, we fabricate substrates with aligned or randomly organized fibrous nanostructured topographies. Culturing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), we explore the dynamic relationship between the alignment of topography, cell shape and cell differentiation to osteogenic and myogenic lineages. We show aligned topographies differentiate cells towards a satellite cell muscle progenitor state - a distinct cell myogenic lineage responsible for postnatal growth and repair of muscle. We analyze cell shape between the different topographies, using fluorescent time-lapse imaging over 21 days. In contrast to previous work, this allows the direct measurement of cell shape at a given time rather than defining the morphology of the underlying topography and neglecting cell shape. We report quantitative metrics of the time-based morphological behaviors of cell shape in response to differing topographies. This analysis offers insights into the relationship between topography, cell shape and cell differentiation. Cells differentiating towards a myogenic fate on aligned topographies adopt a characteristic elongated shape as well as the alignment of cells.

Indexed as

Cell LineageCell ShapeAdipocytesBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell CountCell DifferentiationElasticityHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMuscle DevelopmentOsteogenesisStem CellsTime-Lapse ImagingBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID27910868
PMCPMC5133629
OpenAlexW2559354278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.