Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27910722›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2017

Post-exposure prophylaxis awareness and use among men who have sex with men in London who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications.

William C Goedel, Daniel Hagen, Perry N Halkitis, Richard E Greene, Marybec Griffin-Tomas, Forrest A Brooks, DeMarc Hickson, Dustin T Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William C Goedela Spatial Epidemiology Lab, Department of Population Health, School of Medicine , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
Daniel Hagena Spatial Epidemiology Lab, Department of Population Health, School of Medicine , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
Perry N Halkitisb College of Global Public Health , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
Richard E Greened Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
Marybec Griffin-Tomasb College of Global Public Health , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
Forrest A Brooksa Spatial Epidemiology Lab, Department of Population Health, School of Medicine , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
DeMarc Hicksoni Department of Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Mississippi Medical Center , Jackson , MS , USA.
Dustin T Duncana Spatial Epidemiology Lab, Department of Population Health, School of Medicine , New York University , New York , NY , USA.
New York University · USNew York College of Health Professions · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of new HIV infections continues to be on the rise in many high-income countries, most notably among men who have sex with men (MSM). Despite recent attention to the use of antiretroviral medications as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among MSM, considerably less research has been devoted to examining the awareness and use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Based on a convenience sample of 179 self-reported HIV-uninfected MSM using a geosocial-networking smartphone application, this study is among the first to examine the awareness and use of PEP and their demographic and behavioral correlates among MSM in London. Most respondents (88.3%) had heard of PEP, where 27.4% reported having used it. In multivariable models, the disclosure of one's sexual orientation to their general practitioner (Prevalence ratio [PR]: 3.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 10.70; p = .029) and reporting one's HIV status as negative (rather than unknown) (PR: 11.49; 95% CI: 1.68, 76.92; p = .013) were associated with having heard of PEP; while the recent use of club drugs (PR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.42, 6.43; p = .004) was associated with having ever used PEP. High awareness and use in this sample suggest that PEP is a valuable risk-reduction strategy that should be capitalized on, be it in addition to or in the absence of PrEP.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomosexuality, MaleHIV InfectionsHumansIllicit DrugsLondonMaleMobile ApplicationsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisSmartphoneSocial NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesTruth DisclosureYoung AdultIllicit DrugsMen who have sex with men (MSM)post-exposure prophylaxissmartphone applicationUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID27910722
PMCPMC5453645
OpenAlexW2559496732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.