ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2017
Recommended standards for assessing blood pressure in human research where blood pressure or hypertension is a major focus.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of dose and duration of reduction in dietary sodium on blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Twenty-Four-Hour Diet recall and Diet records compared with 24-hour urinary excretion to predict an individual's sodium consumption: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Pooled it
- Percentage of ingested sodium excreted in 24-hour urine collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Pooled it
- Assessment of dietary sodium intake using a food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour urinary sodium excretion: a systematic literature review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Pooled it
- More evidence that salt increases blood pressure and risk of kidney disease from the Science of Salt: A regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes (April-July 2016).Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Pooled it
- Investigation of the involvement of platelet-activating factor in the control of hypertension by aerobic training. A randomized controlled trial.Biology of sport · 2024Article
- Targeting the Dietary Na:K Ratio-Considerations for Design of an Intervention Study to Impact Blood Pressure.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Brief online certification course for measuring blood pressure with an automated blood pressure device. A free new resource to support World Hypertension Day Oct 17, 2020.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- The impact of small to moderate inaccuracies in assessing blood pressure on hypertension prevalence and control rates.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- The International Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt (TRUE) position statement on the use of 24-hour, spot, and short duration (<24 hours) timed urine collections to assess dietary sodium intake.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
- Dietary sources of salt intake in adults and older people: a population-based study in a Brazilian town.Public health nutrition · 2019Article
- Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Review
- Recommended standards for assessing blood pressure in human research where blood pressure or hypertension is a major focus.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although inaccurate, nonreproducible blood pressure values can result from nonstandardized assessments, recommended approaches to standardize blood pressure measurement are often not followed in research studies. An expert consensus of national and international health and scientific organizations developed recommended minimum standards for assessing blood pressure in research subjects where: (1) blood pressure or hypertension is a major end point, or (2) blood pressure is likely a major mediator of the research outcome. Minimum research standards are presented for training of observers, technical aspects of assessing blood pressure, and equipment for both adults and children. The standards are based on prior recommendations, some of which did not conform to current evidence based-methods. All new research should require adherence to these minimum standards in the patient populations described above. Readers need to use caution in interpreting studies if the standards are not met in the defined populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.