Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909934›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2017

Current achievements and future perspectives of metronomic chemotherapy.

Adriana Romiti, Rosa Falcone, Michela Roberto, Paolo Marchetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Metronomic Therapy in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana RomitiClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. adriana.romiti@uniroma1.it.
Rosa FalconeClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Michela RobertoClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, many anticancer drugs have been tested at metronomic dosages for a variety of tumours. Mechanisms of action attributed to metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) include antiangiogenesis, immunomodulation, direct inhibition of tumour growth, effect on tumour initiating cells and the modulation of clonal evolution. An active clinical research, aimed at testing MCT in several cancers, has been conducted over the past 15 years. However, because the majority of available results come from earlier phase II studies, mainly performed in the area of breast cancer (BC), it is clear that there are areas still to be investigated. We considered current studies dealing with MCT according to the clinical setting of patients. Despite a certain degree of overlap, we were able to identify four main clinical indications for MCT: refractory disease and frailty of patients, advanced stage disease (requiring first and second-line therapy), early stage disease and maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy. In addition, a section of this review has been addressed to the combination of MCT with immunotherapy following the growing interest in the reinstatement of immune-surveillance. Crucial questions, such as the definition of optimal schedules of continuously delivered, low-dose chemotherapy and the recognition and validation of predictive biomarkers, need to be further addressed. Moreover, comparisons with the best supportive care are especially lacking and thus urgently awaited to establish the key role of MCT in the care of pretreated and frail patients. Maintenance therapy promises to be one of the most worthwhile developments for MCT. Currently, several combination strategies with standard chemotherapy, target agents or immunotherapy are under investigation but further efforts are needed to fill the gaps of knowledge in this field.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsFrailtyHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsElderlyImmunotherapyLow-dose chemotherapyMetronomic chemotherapyPredictive biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27909934
OpenAlexW2559352823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.