Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909875›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2017

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Why Biliary Reflux Remains Controversial?

Matthieu Bruzzi, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Sébastien Czernichow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu BruzziService de chirurgie digestive, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris cedex, France. matthieu.bruzzi@aphp.fr.
Jean-Marc ChevallierService de chirurgie digestive, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris cedex, France.
Sébastien CzernichowUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-anastomosis gastric bypass is an alternative to the "gold-standard" Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This technique appears to be safe and efficient, but controversy remains regarding the long-term theoretical risk of subsequent biliary reflux and its possible complications, such as cancer. The aim of the present narrative review was to summarize some of the current thoughts on biliary reflux. Research has established that exposure to chronic bile reflux in humans and rats (outside the "bariatric surgery" box) induce esophageal intestinal metaplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although one-anastomosis gastric bypass can theoretically induce chronic biliary reflux, the incidence of biliary reflux and risk of cancer have not been prospectively evaluated. Clarification of this controversial issue is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassAnimalsBile RefluxHumansRatsBiliary refluxCancerMini-gastric bypassOne-anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID27909875
OpenAlexW2557469990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.