Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909778›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2017

It is all about the solvent: on the importance of the mobile phase for ZIC-HILIC glycopeptide enrichment.

Kathirvel Alagesan, Sana Khan Khilji, Daniel Kolarich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Applications of chromatography in glycomics].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Systems-Wide Site-Specific Analysis of Glycoproteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. The Hitchhiker's guide to glycoproteomics.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathirvel AlagesanDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424, Potsdam, Germany.
Sana Khan KhiljiDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424, Potsdam, Germany.
Daniel KolarichDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424, Potsdam, Germany. daniel.kolarich@mpikg.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-1350
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycopeptide enrichment is a crucial step in glycoproteomics for which hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) has extensively been applied due to its low bias towards different glycan types. A systematic evaluation of applicable HILIC mobile phases on glycopeptide enrichment efficiency and selectivity is, to date, however, still lacking. Here, we present a novel, simplified technique for HILIC enrichment termed "Drop-HILIC", which was applied to systematically evaluate the mobile phase effect on ZIC-HILIC (zwitterionic type of hydrophilic interaction chromatography) glycopeptide enrichment. The four most commonly used MS compatible organic solvents were investigated: (i) acetonitrile, (ii) methanol, (iii) ethanol and (iv) isopropanol. Glycopeptide enrichment efficiencies were evaluated for each solvent system using samples of increasing complexity ranging from well-defined synthetic glycopeptides spiked into different concentrations of tryptic BSA peptides, followed by standard glycoproteins, and a complex sample derived from human (depleted and non-depleted) serum. ZIC-HILIC glycopeptide efficiency largely relied upon the used solvent. Different organic mobile phases enriched distinct glycopeptide subsets in a peptide backbone hydrophilicity-dependant manner. Acetonitrile provided the best compromise for the retention of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic glycopeptides, whereas methanol was confirmed to be unsuitable for this purpose. The enrichment efficiency of ethanol and isopropanol towards highly hydrophobic glycopeptides was compromised as considerable co-enrichment of unmodified peptides occurred, though for some hydrophobic glycopeptides isopropanol showed the best enrichment properties. This study shows that even minor differences in the peptide backbone and solvent do significantly influence HILIC glycopeptide enrichment and need to be carefully considered when employed for glycopeptide enrichment. Graphical Abstract The organic solvent plays a crucial role in ZIC-HILIC glycopeptide enrichment.

Indexed as

AcetonitrilesChromatography, LiquidEthanolGlycopeptidesHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMethanolMolecular StructureSolventsacetonitrileAcetonitrilesEthanolGlycopeptidesMethanolSolventsGlycopeptide enrichmentGlycopeptide synthesisGlycoproteomicsHILICHydrophilic interaction chromatography

Identifiers

PMID27909778
PMCPMC5203826
OpenAlexW2558248097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.