Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909753›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2017

Six-Minute Walk Test as a Predictor for Outcome in Children with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Chronic Stable Heart Failure.

Susanna L den Boer, Daniël H K Flipse, Marijke H van der Meulen, Ad P C M Backx, Gideon J du Marchie Sarvaas, Arend D J Ten Harkel, Gabriëlle G van Iperen, Lukas A J Rammeloo, Ronald B Tanke, Willem A Helbing and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Susanna L den BoerDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniël H K FlipseDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marijke H van der MeulenDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ad P C M BackxDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gideon J du Marchie SarvaasDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arend D J Ten HarkelDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gabriëlle G van IperenDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lukas A J RammelooDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald B TankeDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Willem A HelbingDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim TakkenChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel DalinghausDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.dalinghaus@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is an important tool to predict prognosis in children and adults with heart failure. A much less sophisticated exercise test is the 6 min walk test, which has been shown an independent predictor for morbidity and mortality in adults with heart failure. Therefore, we hypothesized that the 6 min walk test could be predictive for outcome in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. We prospectively included 49 children with dilated cardiomyopathy ≥6 years who performed a 6 min walk test. Median age was 11.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.4-15.1), median time after diagnosis was 3.6 years (IQR 0.6-7.4). The 6 min walk distance was transformed to a percentage of predicted, using age- and gender-specific norm values (6MWD%). For all patients, mean 6MWD% was 70 ± 21%. Median follow-up was 33 months (IQR 14-50). Ten patients reached the combined endpoint of death or heart transplantation. Using univariable Cox regression, a higher 6MWD% resulted in a lower risk of death or transplantation (hazard ratio 0.95 per percentage increase, p = 0.006). A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to define the optimal threshold to identify patients at highest risk for an endpoint. Patients with a 6MWD% < 63% had a 2 year transplant-free survival of 73%, in contrast to a transplant-free survival of 92% in patients with a 6MWD% ≥ 63% (p = 0.003). In children with dilated cardiomyopathy, the 6 min walk test is a simple and feasible tool to identify children with a higher risk of death or heart transplantation.

Indexed as

Exercise ToleranceWalk TestAdolescentCardiomyopathy, DilatedChildChronic DiseaseFemaleHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNetherlandsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies6-minute walk testDilated cardiomyopathyExercise testPediatricsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27909753
PMCPMC5355503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.