Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909591›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2016

Mobbing Exposure of Anaesthesiology Residents in Turkey.

Gülnihal Aykut, Esra Mercanoğlu Efe, Selcan Bayraktar, Sinem Şentürk, İrem Başeğmez, Özlem Özkumit, Elmas Kabak, Belgin Yavaşçaoğlu, Hülya Bilgin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Education in Turkey: Residents' Views.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gülnihal AykutDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Esra Mercanoğlu EfeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Selcan BayraktarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Sinem ŞentürkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
İrem BaşeğmezDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Özlem ÖzkumitDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Elmas KabakDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Belgin YavaşçaoğluDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Hülya BilginDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, psychological problems that are caused by working conditions, like burn out syndrome, are more commonly observed. In our study, we aimed to evaluate mobbing exposure, factors causing mobbing and precautions for mobbing in residency students who are educated in anaesthesiology and reanimation clinics in Turkey.

methodsAfter obtaining consent from the ethics committee, we sent our questionnaires to the secretariats of the departments by postal mail. Completed questionnaires were collected in our department's secretariat blindly and randomly mixed. One hundred and one participants were returned the questionnaires. Data was statistically analysed in SPSS 21.0 software programme.

resultsDuring residency programme, sated to have experienced mobbing one or more time. Interestingly, 5.9% participants complained of physical mobbing. Mobbing exposure was more common in females. The most serious new onset psychosomatic symptoms stated during residency were committing suicide (2%), addiction (16%), severe depression (18%), panic attack (8%), more accidents (7%) and tendency of violence (15%). In mobbing group there was statistically significant dissatisfaction rate.

conclusionIn professions where mobbing is common, incidences of psychiatric diseases and suicide attempts are high are increased. Who are under risk for experiencing mobbing should be noticed carefully to ensure good judgement and problems should be inspected objectively in a detailed manner. Anesthesiology societies and other medical professional societies should establish mobbing committees. Thus, mobbing problems can be resolved and healthy career oppurtunities can be presented to residents.

Indexed as

anaesthesiologyMobbingresidents

Identifiers

PMID27909591
PMCPMC5019868
OpenAlexW2512995887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.