ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2016
Non-invasive methods for embryo selection.
Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Screening Using a Routine IVF Laboratory Workflow.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The global gene expression outline of the bovine blastocyst: reflector of environmental conditions and predictor of developmental capacity.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Follicular fluid estradiol is an improved predictor ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Cryopreservation and its effects on motility and gene expression patterns and fertilizing potential of bovine epididymal sperm.Veterinary medicine and science · 2020Article
- Egg cylinder development during in vitro extended embryo culture predicts the post transfer developmental potential of mouse blastocysts.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Limited relationships between reactive oxygen species levels in culture media and zygote and embryo development.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- The Frequency of Chromosomal Euploidy Among 3PN Embryos.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread use of assisted reproduction, a simple and practical method for embryo selection is needed to optimize the chances of pregnancy while diminishing the incidence of multiple pregnancy and its accompanying problems. Many non-invasive methods for embryo selection have been proposed and some are more promising than others. This review summarizes these methods and attempts to evaluate them in the light of the best currently available evidence and to find out whether any of them is ripe for replacing or supplementing the time-honored method of morphological assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27909565PMC5130307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.