Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909395›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Reversal Learning in Humans and Gerbils: Dynamic Control Network Facilitates Learning.

Christian Jarvers, Tobias Brosch, André Brechmann, Marie L Woldeit, Andreas L Schulz, Frank W Ohl, Marcel Lommerzheim, Heiko Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Serotonergic Facilitation of Forelimb Functional Recovery in Rats with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian JarversFaculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, Institute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University Ulm, Germany.
Tobias BroschFaculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, Institute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University Ulm, Germany.
André BrechmannSpecial Lab Non-Invasive Brain Imaging, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Marie L WoldeitDepartment Systems Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Andreas L SchulzDepartment Systems Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank W OhlDepartment Systems Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Marcel LommerzheimSpecial Lab Non-Invasive Brain Imaging, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Heiko NeumannFaculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, Institute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologically plausible modeling of behavioral reinforcement learning tasks has seen great improvements over the past decades. Less work has been dedicated to tasks involving contingency reversals, i.e., tasks in which the original behavioral goal is reversed one or multiple times. The ability to adjust to such reversals is a key element of behavioral flexibility. Here, we investigate the neural mechanisms underlying contingency-reversal tasks. We first conduct experiments with humans and gerbils to demonstrate memory effects, including multiple reversals in which subjects (humans and animals) show a faster learning rate when a previously learned contingency re-appears. Motivated by recurrent mechanisms of learning and memory for object categories, we propose a network architecture which involves reinforcement learning to steer an orienting system that monitors the success in reward acquisition. We suggest that a model sensory system provides feature representations which are further processed by category-related subnetworks which constitute a neural analog of expert networks. Categories are selected dynamically in a competitive field and predict the expected reward. Learning occurs in sequentialized phases to selectively focus the weight adaptation to synapses in the hierarchical network and modulate their weight changes by a global modulator signal. The orienting subsystem itself learns to bias the competition in the presence of continuous monotonic reward accumulation. In case of sudden changes in the discrepancy of predicted and acquired reward the activated motor category can be switched. We suggest that this subsystem is composed of a hierarchically organized network of dis-inhibitory mechanisms, dubbed a dynamic control network (DCN), which resembles components of the basal ganglia. The DCN selectively activates an expert network, corresponding to the current behavioral strategy. The trace of the accumulated reward is monitored such that large sudden deviations from the monotonicity of its evolution trigger a reset after which another expert subnetwork can be activated-if it has already been established before-or new categories can be recruited and associated with novel behavioral patterns.

Indexed as

adaptive resonance theoryexpert networksrecurrent neural networksreinforcement learningreversal learningstability-plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27909395
PMCPMC5112252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.