Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27909347›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association

Cancer among American Indians - Identifying Priority Areas in Oklahoma.

Sydney A Martinez, Amanda E Janitz, Julie Erb-Alvarez, Dana S Mowls, Janis E Campbell, Tom Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Indigenizing and Ruralizing NCI Screen to Save Program: Resources, Optimizing Outreach, Teaching, Science (ROOTS).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sydney A Martinez
Amanda E Janitz
Julie Erb-Alvarez
Dana S Mowls
Janis E Campbell
Tom Anderson

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JENNIFER DAVID PECK · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Oklahoma Area Tribal Health Comprehensive Prevention Program: PPHF2014U58DP005513 · DP · SOUTHERN PLAINS TRIBAL HEALTH BOARD FOUNDATION · PI ANDERSON, TOM · 2014 to 2014
$850k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP005513NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe and compare cancer incidence and mortality among American Indians (AI/ANs) and whites in nine Indian Health Service (IHS) Service Units in Oklahoma.

methodsUsing data from the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry and the web-based OK2SHARE database, we obtained age-adjusted cancer incidence rates from 1997 to 2012 and cancer mortality rates from 1999 to 2009 for AI/ANs and whites in Oklahoma. We examined differences in primary site, percentage of late stage diagnoses, and trends over time.

resultsAI/ANs consistently had higher cancer incidence and mortality compared to whites in Oklahoma. The magnitude of disparity for cancer incidence and mortality varied by IHS Service Unit and by gender. The top three cancer sites were the same for all Service Units. The percentage of late stage diagnosis also varied by region.

conclusionsWe identify priority areas where cancer disparity challenges exist among AI/ANs in Oklahoma.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIncidenceIndians, North AmericanMaleNeoplasmsOklahomaRegistriesHealth PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesIndiansNeoplasmsNorth AmericanRegistries

Identifiers

PMID27909347
PMCPMC5126965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.