ArticleBMJ open2016
Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Creating a Culture of an Awake and Walking Intensive Care Unit: In-Hospital Strategies to Mitigate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.Critical care clinics · 2025Review
- How does organisational culture facilitate uptake of home dialysis? An ethnographic study of kidney centres in England.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Recognising the deterioration of patients in acute care wards: a qualitative study.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Differences between professionals' views on patient safety culture in long-term and acute care? A cross-sectional study.Leadership in health services (Bradford, England) · 2021Article
- Development of a Simple Index to Measure Overuse of Diagnostic Testing at the Hospital Level Using Administrative Data.Journal of hospital medicine · 2021Article
- The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019Observational
- Antibiotic Stewardship-Twenty Years in the Making.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Does a hospital culture influence adherence to infection prevention and control and rates of healthcare associated infection? A literature review.Journal of infection prevention · 2019Review
- Exploring patient safety in Swedish specialised home healthcare: an interview study with multidisciplinary teams and clinical managers.BMJ open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite widespread interest in the topic, no current synthesis of research is available analysing the linkages between organisational or workplace cultures on the one hand, and patient outcomes on the other. This protocol proposes a systematic review to analyse and synthesise the literature to date on this topic. The resulting review will discuss characteristics of included studies in terms of the type of healthcare settings researched, the measurements of organisational and workplace culture, patient outcomes measured and the influence of these cultures on patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted aiming to examine the associations between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. An English language search of abstracts will be executed using the following academic databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO. The review will include relevant peer-reviewed articles from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series studies, cross-sectional analyses, qualitative studies and mixed-method studies. Multiple researchers will be involved in assessing the quality of articles for inclusion in the review. This protocol documents a detailed search strategy, including terms and inclusion criteria, which will form the basis of the subsequent systematic review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.