Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27908847›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2017

Homeostasis of the gut barrier and potential biomarkers.

Jerry M Wells, Robert J Brummer, Muriel Derrien, Thomas T MacDonald, Freddy Troost, Patrice D Cani, Vassilia Theodorou, Jan Dekker, Agnes Méheust, Willem M de Vos and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 320 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
320citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

320 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 604 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. TibetanNutrients · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Jerry M WellsHost-Microbe Interactomics, Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; jerry.wells@wur.nl.
Robert J BrummerNutrition-Gut-Brain Interactions Research Centre, School of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Muriel DerrienCentre Daniel Carasso, Danone Research, Palaiseau, France.
Thomas T MacDonaldBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Freddy TroostDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Patrice D CaniLouvain Drug Research Institute, WELBIO (Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and BIOtechnology), Metabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Vassilia TheodorouNeuro-Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Toulouse, France.
Jan DekkerHost-Microbe Interactomics, Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Agnes MéheustDanone, Paris, France.
Willem M de VosLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Annick MercenierInstitute of Nutritional Science, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland; and.
Arjen NautaFrieslandCampina, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Clara L Garcia-RodenasInstitute of Nutritional Science, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland; and.
Wageningen University & Research · NLDanone (France) · FRNestlé (Switzerland) · CHFrieslandCampina (Netherlands) · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLÖrebro University · SEQueen Mary University of London · GBUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut barrier plays a crucial role by spatially compartmentalizing bacteria to the lumen through the production of secreted mucus and is fortified by the production of secretory IgA (sIgA) and antimicrobial peptides and proteins. With the exception of sIgA, expression of these protective barrier factors is largely controlled by innate immune recognition of microbial molecular ligands. Several specialized adaptations and checkpoints are operating in the mucosa to scale the immune response according to the threat and prevent overreaction to the trillions of symbionts inhabiting the human intestine. A healthy microbiota plays a key role influencing epithelial barrier functions through the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and interactions with innate pattern recognition receptors in the mucosa, driving the steady-state expression of mucus and antimicrobial factors. However, perturbation of gut barrier homeostasis can lead to increased inflammatory signaling, increased epithelial permeability, and dysbiosis of the microbiota, which are recognized to play a role in the pathophysiology of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, gut-brain signaling may be affected by prolonged mucosal immune activation, leading to increased afferent sensory signaling and abdominal symptoms. In turn, neuronal mechanisms can affect the intestinal barrier partly by activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and both mast cell-dependent and mast cell-independent mechanisms. The modulation of gut barrier function through nutritional interventions, including strategies to manipulate the microbiota, is considered a relevant target for novel therapeutic and preventive treatments against a range of diseases. Several biomarkers have been used to measure gut permeability and loss of barrier integrity in intestinal diseases, but there remains a need to explore their use in assessing the effect of nutritional factors on gut barrier function. Future studies should aim to establish normal ranges of available biomarkers and their predictive value for gut health in human cohorts.

Indexed as

AnimalsGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal TractHomeostasisHumansMicrobiotaantimicrobial peptidesepithelial permeabilitygut barriermicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID27908847
PMCPMC5440615
OpenAlexW2558803112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.