Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27908748›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2017

The chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel selectively impairs learning while sparing source memory and spatial memory.

Alexandra E Smith, Richard A Slivicki, Andrea G Hohmann, Jonathon D Crystal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A test of the reward-contrast hypothesis.Behavioural processes · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra E SmithDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Richard A SlivickiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Andrea G HohmannDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States; Gill Center for Biomolecular Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Jonathon D CrystalDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States. Electronic address: jcrystal@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

INTEGRATIVE PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCH AT INDIANA UNIVERSITYT32DA024628 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrea Grace Hohmann, Kenneth Mackie · 2008 to 2026
$3.1M
Role of CB2 in Analgesic MechanismsR01DA041229 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOHMANN, ANDREA GRACE, MACKIE, KENNETH · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NOS1AP as a novel target for treating pathological painR01CA200417 · NCI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI COURTNEY, MICHAEL, HOHMANN, ANDREA GRACE · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
Episodic memory protection in apolipoprotein E (APOE) knockout ratsR21AG051753 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI CRYSTAL, JONATHON D · 2016 to 2017
$430k
Protein-protein interaction inhibitors as novel analgesicsR21DA037673 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOHMANN, ANDREA GRACE · 2013 to 2014
$429k
A rodent model of prospective memoryR21AG044530 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI CRYSTAL, JONATHON D · 2013 to 2014
$429k
A Novel Mechanism for Decreasing Opioid RewardR21DA042584 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOHMANN, ANDREA GRACE, REBEC, GEORGE VINCENT · 2016 to 2017
$392k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200417NIA NIH HHS R21 AG044530NIA NIH HHS R21 AG051753NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041229NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037673NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA042584NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic agents are widely used to treat patients with systemic cancer. The efficacy of these therapies is undermined by their adverse side-effect profiles such as cognitive deficits that have a negative impact on the quality of life of cancer survivors. Cognitive side effects occur across a variety of domains, including memory, executive function, and processing speed. Such impairments are exacerbated under cognitive challenges and a subgroup of patients experience long-term impairments. Episodic memory in rats can be examined using a source memory task. In the current study, rats received paclitaxel, a taxane-derived chemotherapeutic agent, and learning and memory functioning was examined using the source memory task. Treatment with paclitaxel did not impair spatial and episodic memory, and paclitaxel treated rats were not more susceptible to cognitive challenges. Under conditions in which memory was not impaired, paclitaxel treatment impaired learning of new rules, documenting a decreased sensitivity to changes in experimental contingencies. These findings provide new information on the nature of cancer chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairments, particularly regarding the incongruent vulnerability of episodic memory and new learning following treatment with paclitaxel.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBody WeightCognition DisordersLearning DisabilitiesMaleMaze LearningPaclitaxelPhysical StimulationRatsRats, Long-EvansSpatial MemoryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelEpisodic memoryLearningPaclitaxelRatsSource memorySpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID27908748
PMCPMC5239738
OpenAlexW2558047927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.