ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2016
Lateralization of interaural timing differences with multi-electrode stimulation in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Lateralization of interaural time differences with mixed rates of stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.eLife · 2021Article
- Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users have shown variability in interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity at different places along the cochlea. This paper investigates perception of multi-electrode binaural stimulation to determine if auditory object formation (AOF) and lateralization are affected by variability in ITD sensitivity when a complex sound is encoded with multi-channel processing. AOF and ITD lateralization were compared between single- and multi-electrode configurations. Most (7/8) BiCI users perceived a single auditory object with multi-electrode stimulation, and the range of lateralization was comparable to single-electrode stimulation, suggesting that variability in single-electrode ITD sensitivity does not compromise AOF with multi-electrode stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.