ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2016
Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating band importance for environmental sound recognition using deep learninga).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Cross-frequency interactions in band importance functions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Frequency-to-Place Mismatch and Cochlear Implant Outcomes by Electrode Type.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Article
- Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition in the presence of extended high-frequency cues.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Objective intelligibility measurement of reverberant vocoded speech for normal-hearing listeners: Towards facilitating the development of speech enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Spectral weighting for sentence recognition in steady-state and amplitude-modulated noise.JASA express letters · 2023Article
- Imaging-based frequency mapping for cochlear implants - Evaluated using a daily randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Factors influencing the relationship between cochlear health measures and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Article
- Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.American journal of audiology · 2022Article
- Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition.JASA express letters · 2021Article
- The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Individualized frequency importance functions for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.Hearing research · 2018Article
- Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Band importance functions estimate the relative contribution of individual acoustic frequency bands to speech intelligibility. Previous studies of band importance in listeners with cochlear implants have used experimental maps and direct stimulation. Here, band importance was estimated for clinical maps with acoustic stimulation. Listeners with cochlear implants had band importance functions that relied more heavily on lower frequencies and showed less cross-listener consistency than in listeners with normal hearing. The intersubject variability observed here indicates that averaging band importance functions across listeners with cochlear implants, as has been done in previous studies, may not be meaningful. Additionally, band importance functions of listeners with normal hearing for vocoded speech that either did or did not simulate spread of excitation were not different from one another, suggesting that additional factors beyond spread of excitation are necessary to account for changes in band importance in listeners with cochlear implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.