Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27907145›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Training to Improve Precision and Accuracy in the Measurement of Fiber Morphology.

Nathan A Hotaling, Jun Jeon, Mary Beth Wade, Derek Luong, Xavier-Lewis Palmer, Kapil Bharti, Carl G Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Resorbable vascular grafts show rapid cellularization and degradation in the ovine carotid.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan A HotalingBiosystems & Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8423-6464
Jun JeonUnit on Ocular and Stem Cell Translational Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mary Beth WadeIntegrated Biosciences PhD Student, Department of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.
Derek LuongDepartment of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.
Xavier-Lewis PalmerBiosystems & Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Kapil BhartiUnit on Ocular and Stem Cell Translational Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Carl G SimonBiosystems & Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated $7.1 billion dollars a year is spent due to irreproducibility in pre-clinical data from errors in data analysis and reporting. Therefore, developing tools to improve measurement comparability is paramount. Recently, an open source tool, DiameterJ, has been deployed for the automated analysis of scanning electron micrographs of fibrous scaffolds designed for tissue engineering applications. DiameterJ performs hundreds to thousands of scaffold fiber diameter measurements from a single micrograph within a few seconds, along with a variety of other scaffold morphological features, which enables a more rigorous and thorough assessment of scaffold properties. Herein, an online, publicly available training module is introduced for educating DiameterJ users on how to effectively analyze scanning electron micrographs of fibers and the large volume of data that a DiameterJ analysis yields. The end goal of this training was to improve user data analysis and reporting to enhance reproducibility of analysis of nanofiber scaffolds. User performance was assessed before and after training to evaluate the effectiveness of the training modules. Users were asked to use DiameterJ to analyze reference micrographs of fibers that had known diameters. The results showed that training improved the accuracy and precision of measurements of fiber diameter in scanning electron micrographs. Training also improved the precision of measurements of pore area, porosity, intersection density, and characteristic fiber length between fiber intersections. These results demonstrate that the DiameterJ training module improves precision and accuracy in fiber morphology measurements, which will lead to enhanced data comparability.

Indexed as

Quality ControlBiocompatible MaterialsCell ProliferationHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanofibersStatistics as TopicTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID27907145
PMCPMC5132175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.