Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27907132›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Simplified and Efficient Process for Insulin Production in Pichia pastoris.

Sulena Polez, Domenico Origi, Sotir Zahariev, Corrado Guarnaccia, Sergio G Tisminetzky, Nataša Skoko, Marco Baralle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Ethanol Stress onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Metabolic Engineering ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sulena PolezICGEB, Trieste, Italy.
Domenico OrigiBiomanufacturing Sciences Network, Process Solutions, Merck SpA, Vimodrone (Milan), Italy.
Sotir ZaharievICGEB, Trieste, Italy.
Corrado GuarnacciaICGEB, Trieste, Italy.
Sergio G TisminetzkyICGEB, Trieste, Italy.
Nataša SkokoICGEB, Trieste, Italy.
Marco BaralleICGEB, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-1013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant barrier to insulin is affordability. In this manuscript we describe improvements to key steps in the insulin production process in Pichia pastoris that reduce cost and time. The strategy for recovery and processing of human insulin precursor has been streamlined to two steps from bioreactor to the transpeptidation reaction. In the first step the insulin precursor secreted during the methanol induction phase is recovered directly from the culture broth using Tangential Flow Filtration with a Prostak™ module eliminating the laborious and time-consuming multi-step clarification, including centrifugation. In the second step the protein is applied at very high loadings on a cation exchange resin and eluted in a mixture of water and ethanol to obtain a concentrated insulin precursor, suitable for use directly in the transpeptidation reaction. Overall the yield from insulin precursor to human insulin was 51% and consisted of three purification chromatography steps. In addition we describe a method for recovery of the excess of H-Thr(tBu)-OtBu from the transpeptidation reaction mixture, one of the more costly reagents in the process, along with its successful reuse.

Indexed as

BioreactorsFermentationBatch Cell Culture TechniquesChromatographyHumansInsulinPichiaProteolysisRecombinant ProteinsInsulinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27907132
PMCPMC5131935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.