Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27907089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Cristina Lamos, Charlotte Mihaljevic, Sebastian Aulmann, Thomas Bruckner, Christoph Domschke, Markus Wallwiener, Carmen Paringer, Herbert Fluhr, Sarah Schott, Christine Dinkic and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cancer of the vagina: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of related factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia complicated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cancer of the vagina: 2021 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Vaginal Dysplasia and HIV: An African American and Caribbean American Cohort Study.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina LamosDepartment of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Charlotte MihaljevicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian AulmannPractice for Pathology, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph DomschkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carmen ParingerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Herbert FluhrDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah SchottDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christine DinkicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Janina BruckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael GolattaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lisa GensthalerUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael EichbaumDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Christof SohnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim RomDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three different grades of VAIN. VAIN 1 is also known as a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), whereas VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 both represent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Risk factors for the development of VAIN are similar to those for cervical neoplasia, i.e. promiscuity, starting sexual activity at an early age, tobacco consumption and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). However, compared to other intraepithelial neoplasia such as CIN or VIN (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), there still is little understanding about the natural course of VAIN and its capacity for pro- or regression. Furthermore, there is controversial data about the HPV detection rate in VAIN lesions. PATIENTS AND

methods67 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN, who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 at the University Women´s Hospital of Heidelberg Germany, were included in this study. The biopsies of all participating patients were subjected to HPV genotyping. GP-E6/E7 Nested Multiplex PCR (NMPCR) was used to identify and genotype HPV. Eighteen pairs of type-specific nested PCR primers were assessed to detect the following "high-risk" HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68, as well as the "low-risk" genotypes 6/11, 42, 43 and 44. The data was analyzed with the software SAS (Statistical Analysis System).

resultsAll 67 cases were eligible for DNA analysis. The median age was 53 years. The largest group with 53% (n = 36) was formed by women, who were first diagnosed with VAIN between the age of 41 to 60 years. 50% (n = 37) of the patients presented a VAIN in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. 58 (87%) were diagnosed with HSIL (VAIN). The median age in patients with LSIL (VAIN) was 53 years and in patients with HSIL (VAIN) 53.5 years. 12 women (18%) had an immunosuppression. HPV positivity was confirmed in 37 patients (55%). Except for a single patient, who had a triple infection with HPV types 6/11, 16 and 68, only infections with one single HPV genotype were detected. An infection with the HPV genotypes 31, 39, 45, 51, 58, 59, 66, 42, 43 and 44 couldn't be found in any of the patients. In 28 patients with diagnosed VAIN, an infection with HPV 16 could be shown, 24 (86%) of them were diagnosed with a HSIL (VAIN). 16 (24%) women presented condylomata and 13 of them (81%) had a positive HPV status. However, only 47% of the women without condylomata presented a positive HPV status, resulting in a significant correlation (p = 0.0164) between condylomata and HPV infection. In 28 of all 67 patients (42%), recurrence of the neoplasia occurred.

conclusionHPV 16 is the main virus-type to be associated with the development of a VAIN. Also, HPV 16 infection, VIN or condylomata acuminata in the past medical history seemed to be significant factors for early relapse.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsRisk FactorsUterine Cervical DysplasiaVaginaVaginal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27907089
PMCPMC5132291
OpenAlexW2559201365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.