Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27907062›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2016

Sepsis Prevalence and Outcome on the General Wards and Emergency Departments in Wales: Results of a Multi-Centre, Observational, Point Prevalence Study.

Tamas Szakmany, Robert M Lundin, Ben Sharif, Gemma Ellis, Paul Morgan, Maja Kopczynska, Amrit Dhadda, Charlotte Mann, Danielle Donoghue, Sarah Rollason and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Sepsis outcomes in patients with pre-existing liver disease.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Critical care clinics · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tamas SzakmanyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-8844
Robert M LundinCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Ben SharifCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Gemma EllisCritical Care Directorate, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Paul MorganCritical Care Directorate, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Maja KopczynskaCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Amrit DhaddaCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Charlotte MannCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Danielle DonoghueCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Sarah RollasonCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Emma BrownlowCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Francesca HillCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Grace CarrCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Hannah TurleyCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
James HassallCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
James LloydCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Llywela DaviesCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Michael AtkinsonCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Molly JonesCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Nerys JonesCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Rhodri MartinCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Yousef IbrahimCardiff University Research Society (CUReS), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Judith E HallDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Welsh Digital Data Collection Platform Collaborators
Cardiff University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBCwm Taf University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on sepsis prevalence on the general wards is lacking on the UK and in the developed world. We conducted a multicentre, prospective, observational study of the prevalence of patients with sepsis or severe sepsis on the general wards and Emergency Departments (ED) in Wales. During the 24-hour study period all patients with NEWS≥3 were screened for presence of 2 or more SIRS criteria. To be eligible for inclusion, patients had to have a high clinical suspicion of an infection, together with a systemic inflammatory response (sepsis) and evidence of acute organ dysfunction and/or shock (severe sepsis). There were 5317 in-patients in the 24-hour study period. Data were returned on 1198 digital data collection forms on patients with NEWS≥3 of which 87 were removed, leaving 1111 for analysis. 146 patients had sepsis and 144 patients had severe sepsis. Combined prevalence of sepsis and severe sepsis was 5.5% amongst all in-patients. Patients with sepsis had significantly higher NEWS scores (3 IQR 3-4 for non-sepsis and 4 IQR 3-6 for sepsis patients, respectively). Common organ dysfunctions in severe sepsis were hypoxia (47%), hypoperfusion (40%) and acute kidney injury (25%). Mortality at 90 days was 31% with a median (IQR) hospital free stay of 78 (36-85) days. Screening for sepsis, referral to Critical Care and completion of Sepsis 6 bundle was low: 26%, 16% and 12% in the sepsis group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified higher National Early Warning Score, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, malignancy and current or previous smoking habits as independent variables suggesting the diagnosis of sepsis. We observed that sepsis is more prevalent in the general ward and ED than previously suggested before and that screening and effective treatment for sepsis and severe sepsis is far from being operationalized in this environment, leading to high 90 days mortality.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatients' RoomsAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityCross InfectionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentPrevalenceRisk FactorsSepsisWales

Identifiers

PMID27907062
PMCPMC5132245
OpenAlexW2558046422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.