Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906867›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2017

External validation of the Air Medical Prehospital Triage score for identifying trauma patients likely to benefit from scene helicopter transport.

Joshua B Brown, Mark L Gestring, Francis X Guyette, Matthew R Rosengart, Nicole A Stassen, Raquel M Forsythe, Timothy R Billiar, Andrew B Peitzman, Jason L Sperry

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joshua B BrownFrom the Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Department of Surgery (J.B.B., M.R.R., R.M.F., T.R.B., A.B.P., J.L.S.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.L.G., N.A.S.), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; and Department of Emergency Medicine (F.X.G.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mark L Gestring
Francis X Guyette
Matthew R Rosengart
Nicole A Stassen
Raquel M Forsythe
Timothy R Billiar
Andrew B Peitzman
Jason L Sperry

Funding

TRAINING IN TRAUMA AND SEPSIS RESEARCHT32GM008516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TIMOTHY R BILLIAR · 1994 to 2026
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Air Medical Prehospital Triage (AMPT) score was developed to identify injured patients who may benefit from scene helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transport. External validation using a different data set is essential to ensure reliable performance. The study objective was to validate the effectiveness of the AMPT score to identify patients with a survival benefit from HEMS using the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study registry.

methodsPatients 16 years or older undergoing scene HEMS or ground EMS (GEMS) transport in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study registry 2000-2013 were included. Patients with 2 or higher AMPT score points were triaged to HEMS, while those with less than 2 points were triaged to GEMS. Multilevel Poisson regression determined the association of survival with actual transport mode across AMPT score triage assignments, adjusting for demographics, mechanism, vital signs, interventions, and injury severity. Successful validation was defined as no survival benefit for actual HEMS transport in patients triaged to GEMS by the AMPT score, with a survival benefit for actual HEMS transport in patients triaged to HEMS by the AMPT score. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients treated by advanced life support providers and patients with transport times longer than 10 minutes.

resultsThere were 222,827 patients included. For patients triaged to GEMS by the AMPT score, actual transport mode was not associated with survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 0.999-1.009; p = 0.08). For patients triaged to HEMS by the AMPT score, actual HEMS transport was associated with a 6.7% increase in the relative probability of survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.067; 95% confidence interval, 1.040-1.083, p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups.

conclusionsThis study is the first to externally validate the AMPT score, demonstrating the ability of this tool to reliably identify trauma patients most likely to benefit from HEMS transport. The AMPT score should be considered when protocols for HEMS scene transport are developed and reviewed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III; therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesAdultAgedEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPennsylvaniaRegistriesSurvival RateTriageWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID27906867
PMCPMC5250556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.