ArticleTransplantation2017
Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.
Article in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation.Health care management science · 2024Article
- Removing geographic boundaries from liver allocation: A method for designing continuous distribution scores.Clinical transplantation · 2023Article
- Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGeographic disparities persist in access to liver transplantation. Candidates with similar urgency experience varying opportunities for transplants across the United States. Policymakers are poised to act and 1 proposal entails reorganizing the current Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) of 11 regions into 8 districts. However, redistricting has the shortcomings that Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) are disconnected from their immediate neighbors by district borders and that it is not easily responsive to uncertainty resulting from variability in donor and listing rates.
methodsWe introduce the notion of an OPO's neighborhood-a collection of donor service areas (DSA) surrounding the OPO that acts as the OPO's region in the current local-regional-national framework. Districts and concentric circles are special cases. We design 58 neighborhoods for the DSAs with several attractive properties and optimize them to balance supplies and demands using 10 years of Organ Procurement and Transplant Network data. We conduct a simulation experiment comparing current allocation, redistricting, and neighborhoods under current sharing policies with respect to the following metrics: total mortalities, DSA-average model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at transplant, DSA-average MELD standard deviation, and average organ transport distance. Liver-simulated allocation model cannot accommodate neighborhoods, so we programmed a discrete-event simulator, LivSim, to approximate liver-simulated allocation model.
resultsWe exhibited a neighborhood solution. Compared with the current allocation, simulation results showed that neighborhoods reduce the DSA-average MELD standard deviation by 29% and save about 65 lives annually. Compared with redistricting, the neighborhoods had smaller average transport distances that were more uniform across DSAs, saved about 20 additional lives, and reduced DSA-average MELD standard deviation by an additional 17%.
conclusionsAlternatives to redistricting with desirable properties and performance are possible and should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.