Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906680›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Chemopreventive effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid on inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer and dysplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Xinyun Qiu, Jingjing Ma, Kai Wang, Hongjie Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Risks of Cancer Associated with Therapeutic Drugs for Inflammatory Bowel Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  20. Erlotinib suppresses tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2024
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xinyun QiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.
Jingjing MaDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.
Kai WangInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Hongjie ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe chemopreventive effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been widely studied; however, the results remain conflicting. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and update evidence concerning effects of 5-ASA on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and dysplasia (Dys) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD).

results5-ASA showed a chemopreventive effect against CRC/Dys in IBD patients (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45-0.75). However, this effect was significant only in clinical-based studies (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.39-0.65), but not in population-based studies (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.46-1.09). Moreover, this effect was noticeable in patients with UC (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34-0.61), but not in CD (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.42-1.03), and on the outcome of CRC (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39-0.74), but not Dys (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.20-1.10). In IBD patients, mesalazine dosage ≥ 1.2 g/day showed greater protective effects against CRC/Dys than dosages < 1.2 g/day. However, Sulphasalazine therapy did not show any noticeable protective function regardless of the dosage administered. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis of 26 observational studies involving 15,460 subjects to evaluate the risks of developing CRC and Dys in IBD patients receiving 5-ASA treatment. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each evaluation index.

conclusions5-ASA has a chemopreventive effect on CRC (but not Dys) in IBD patients. Moreover, UC patients can benefit more from 5-ASA than CD patients. Mesalazine maintenance dosage ≥ 1.2 g/day is an effective treatment for reducing CRC risk in IBD patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChemopreventionCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsHumansHyperplasiaInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMesalamineOdds RatioPopulation SurveillancePublication BiasRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamine5-Aminosalicylic acidchemopreventive effectcolorectal cancerdysplasiainflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID27906680
PMCPMC5352032
OpenAlexW2558521520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.