Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906463›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in mouse biology2016

Measurement of Behavioral Taste Responses in Mice: Two-Bottle Preference, Lickometer, and Conditioned Taste-Aversion Tests.

Dany Gaillard, Jennifer M Stratford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in mouse biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 2: toxicological testing, assays, and state of the science.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Fat taste responsiveness, but not dietary fat intake, is affected inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of Taste Function.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dany GaillardDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology and the Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Jennifer M StratfordDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology and the Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Zero to Three · US

Funding

NIDCD P30 Core: Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell CenterP30DC004657 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KINNAMON, SUE C., RESTREPO, DIEGO · 2000 to 2014
$7.6M
Mechanisms of Adult Taste Bud RegenerationR01DC012383 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BARLOW, LINDA A · 2012 to 2021
$3.4M
The Neurobiology of Sour TasteR01DC012931 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FINGER, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004657NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012383NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural like and dislike of foods based on taste is one of the most easily observed behaviors in animals. Animals eat palatable foods and reject aversive foods, which makes measurement of taste perception possible using various behavioral techniques. Three different methods to accurately measure taste behavior are described here. First, two-bottle preference tests evaluate whether a taste compound (tastant) is preferred over water. Second, lickometer tests quantify the like and dislike for multiple concentrations of the same tastant or multiple tastants at the same time. Finally, conditioned taste aversion tests accurately determine the perceived taste threshold for palatable tastants. Together, these diverse methods enable researchers to observe and measure behavioral taste responses in mice to any tastant. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalFood PreferencesMiceTasteTaste PerceptionAnimalsBiological Assayconditioned taste aversionlickometertaste behaviortaste discriminationtaste thresholdtwo-bottle preference test

Identifiers

PMID27906463
PMCPMC7108783
OpenAlexW2560289753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.