Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906201›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

The cost of molecular-guided therapy in oncology: a prospective cost study alongside the MOSCATO trial.

Arnaud Pagès, Stéphanie Foulon, Zhaomin Zou, Ludovic Lacroix, François Lemare, Thierry de Baère, Christophe Massard, Jean-Charles Soria, Julia Bonastre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arnaud PagèsGustave Roussy, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-8693
Stéphanie FoulonGustave Roussy, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.
Zhaomin ZouGustave Roussy, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.
Ludovic LacroixGustave Roussy, Département de Biologie et Pathologie Médicales, Villejuif, France.
François LemareGustave Roussy, Département de la Pharmacie Clinique, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-970X
Thierry de BaèreUniversité Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Christophe MassardGustave Roussy, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France.
Jean-Charles SoriaUniversité Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Julia BonastreGustave Roussy, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThere is increasing use of molecular technologies to guide cancer treatments, but few cost data are available. Our objective was to assess the costs of molecular-guided therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors alongside the Molecular Screening for Cancer Treatment and Optimization (MOSCATO) trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study population consisted of 529 patients. The molecular diagnosis included seven steps from tumor biopsy to the multidisciplinary molecular tumor board. The cost of a complete molecular diagnosis was assessed by micro-costing. Direct costs incurred from enrollment until progression were assessed from the French National Health Insurance perspective.

resultsThe patients' mean age was 54 years (range: 3-82) and the mean follow-up period was 145 days (range: 1-707 days). A complete molecular diagnosis cost [euro ]2,396. There were 220 patients with an actionable target (42%), among whom 105 (20%) actually received a targeted therapy. The cost of molecular-guided therapy per patient was [euro ]31,269. The main cost drivers were anticancer drugs (54%) and hospitalizations (35%).

conclusionThis prospective cost analysis showed that molecular diagnosis accounts for only 6% of the cost of molecular-guided therapy per patient. The costs of drugs and hospitalizations are the main cost drivers.Genet Med advance online publication 01 December 2016.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoplasmsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27906201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.