Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906158›Full record

SynthesisNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2016

Singing for Lung Health-a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement.

Adam Lewis, Phoene Cave, Myra Stern, Lindsay Welch, Karen Taylor, Juliet Russell, Anne-Marie Doyle, Anne-Marie Russell, Heather McKee, Stephen Clift and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05350436 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

More Singing, Less Swinging - Is Singing Related to Improved Postural Control?

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrunel UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsHealthy Aging, Balance, Distorted, SingingArmsBalance Conditions, Singing
NCT07460999 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects and Mechanisms of Online Delivered Singing Training vs Usual Care in Patients With Persistent Symptoms 6-18 Months After Surgical Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - a Multi-centre RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseArmsSinging training (Singing for Lung Health (SLH)), Control group: Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effect of Singing on Symptoms in Stable COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Singing for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Group singing improves depression and life quality in patients with stable COPD: a randomized community-based trial in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Singing for adults with chronic respiratory disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adam LewisNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Phoene CaveNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Myra SternRespiratory Medicine, Whittington Health, London, UK.
Lindsay WelchSouthampton Integrated COPD Service, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Karen TaylorNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Juliet RussellNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anne-Marie DoyleNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anne-Marie RussellNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Heather McKeeBritish Lung Foundation, London, UK.
Stephen CliftSidney De Haan Research Centre for Arts and Health, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
Julia BottNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas S HopkinsonNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in Singing for Lung Health (SLH), an approach where patients with respiratory disease take part in singing groups, intended to improve their condition. A consensus group was convened in early 2016 to address issues including: the specific features that make SLH distinct from other forms of participation in singing; the existing evidence base via a systematic review; gaps in the evidence base including the need to define value-based outcome measures for sustainable commissioning of SLH; defining the measures needed to evaluate both individuals' responses to SLH and the quality of singing programmes. and core training, expertise and competencies required by singing group leaders to deliver high-quality programmes. A systematic review to establish the extent of the evidence base for SLH was undertaken. Electronic databases, including Pubmed, OVID Medline and Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and PEDro, were used. Six studies were included in the final review. Quantitative data suggest that singing has the potential to improve health-related quality of life, particularly related to physical health, and levels of anxiety without causing significant side effects. There is a significant risk of bias in many of the existing studies with small numbers of subjects overall. Little comparison can be made between studies owing to their heterogeneity in design. Qualitative data indicate that singing is an enjoyable experience for patients, who consistently report that it helps them to cope with their condition better. Larger and longer-term trials are needed.

Indexed as

SingingHumansLungLung DiseasesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID27906158
PMCPMC5131649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.