Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906129›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

The evolutionary origin of bilaterian smooth and striated myocytes.

Thibaut Brunet, Antje Hl Fischer, Patrick Rh Steinmetz, Antonella Lauri, Paola Bertucci, Detlev Arendt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A chromosome-level genome assembly for the colonial marine hydrozoanbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. One Biology and the Status of Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tissue specificity follows gene duplication.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Remodeling of theBiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution of the cardiac dyad.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. CaThe FEBS journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thibaut BrunetDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-1613
Antje Hl FischerDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick Rh SteinmetzDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonella LauriDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Paola BertucciDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Detlev ArendtDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-050X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dichotomy between smooth and striated myocytes is fundamental for bilaterian musculature, but its evolutionary origin is unsolved. In particular, interrelationships of visceral smooth muscles remain unclear. Absent in fly and nematode, they have not yet been characterized molecularly outside vertebrates. Here, we characterize expression profile, ultrastructure, contractility and innervation of the musculature in the marine annelid

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMuscle CellsMuscle ContractionMusclesPolychaetacell type evolutiondevelopmental biologyevo-devoevolutionary biologygenomics<i>p. dumerilii</i>musculaturePlatynereissmooth musclestem cellsUrbilateria

Identifiers

PMID27906129
PMCPMC5167519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.