ReviewInfection ecology & epidemiology2016
One Health research and training in Australia and New Zealand.
Review in Infection ecology & epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisectoral coordination in public health: insights from the 8th EMPHNET regional conference.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review.One health outlook · 2024Article
- Characterising Biosecurity Initiatives Globally to Support the Development of a Progressive Management Pathway for Terrestrial Animals: A Scoping Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- International stakeholder perspectives on One Health training and empowerment: a needs assessment for a One Health Workforce Academy.One health outlook · 2023Article
- Capacity for One Health research in the Horn of Africa.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Texas professionals are employing a one health approach to protect the United States against biosecurity threats.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- One Health: An Effective and Ethical Approach to Leptospirosis Control in Australia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
- Systemic factors for enhancing intersectoral collaboration for the operationalization of One Health: a case study in India.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Mitigating Future Respiratory Virus Pandemics: New Threats and Approaches to Consider.Viruses · 2021Review
- Biodiversity and Human Health Interlinkages in Higher Education Offerings: A First Global Overview.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Developing a Global One Health Workforce: The "Rx One Health Summer Institute" Approach.EcoHealth · 2020Article
- What makes an effective One Health clinical practitioner? Opinions of Australian One Health experts.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Beliefs, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Australian Veterinary Students Regarding One Health and Zoonosis Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Checklist for One Health Epidemiological Reporting of Evidence (COHERE).One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Article
- Foreword.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThis review was performed to create a repository of information on One Health research and training in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). The review sought to determine 1) how many training activities there are in ANZ, 2) how much research on zoonotic diseases is undertaken by multidisciplinary teams, and 3) how collaborative and integrated they are. RECENT
findingsThere are few opportunities for training in One Health in ANZ. The majority require enrolment in a postgraduate degree programme, and there is only one postgraduate level course that is also available for continuing professional development (CPD). Of the broad range of One Health research performed in ANZ, the majority is performed by teams with limited disciplinary diversity, although diversity is improving. SUMMARY: Progress has been made in building collaboration between human, animal, and environmental health professions. However, the lack of clearly defined competencies and agreed purpose for One Health may be impeding collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.