Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27906068›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2016

Novel use of cranial epidural space in rabbits as an animal model to investigate bone volume augmentation potential of different bone graft substitutes.

Ivan Valdivia-Gandur, Wilfried Engelke, Víctor Beltrán, Eduardo Borie, Ramón Fuentes, María Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ivan Valdivia-GandurBiomedical Department, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile.
Wilfried EngelkeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany.
Víctor BeltránDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany. victor.beltran@ufrontera.cl.
Eduardo BorieFaculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Ramón FuentesFaculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
María Cristina Manzanares-CéspedesMuscular and Skeletal Pathology Research, Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Antofagasta · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of bone augmentation to a major degree depends on the biomechanics and biological conditions of the surrounding tissues. Therefore, an animal model is needed providing anatomical sites with similar mechanical pressures for comparing its influence on different biomaterials for bone regeneration. The present report describes the new bone formation associated to biomaterial in a bursa created in the epidural space, between dura mater and cranial calvaria, under the constant pressure of cerebrospinal fluid.

methodsFive adult California rabbits were used for the trial. In each animal, two bursae were created in the epidural spaces, in the anterior part of the skull, below both sides of the interfrontal suture. The spaces between dura mater and cranial calvaria were filled with in-situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate containing hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium-phosphate (BCP), in-situ hardening phase-pure beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) or without any biomaterials (sham). After 90 days, the animals were sacrificed, and the defect sites were extracted and processed for histomorphometric analysis by optical and backscattered electron microscopy.

resultsThe cranial epidural spaces created (n = 10) could be preserved by the application both BCP (n = 3) and β-TCP biomaterials (n = 3) in all experimental sites. The sites augmented with BCP showed less new bone formation but a trend to better volume preservation than the sites augmented with β-TCP. However, the bone in the BCP sites seemed to be more mature as indicated by the higher percentage of lamellar bone in the sites. In contrast, the created space could not be preserved, and new bone formation was scarce in the sham-operated sites (n = 4).

conclusionThe experimental bursae created bilaterally in the epidural space allows comparing objectively bone formation in relation to biomaterials for bone regeneration under permanent physiological forces from cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCalcium PhosphatesDisease Models, AnimalEpidural SpaceHydroxyapatitesImmunohistochemistryOsteogenesisRabbitsRandom AllocationSensitivity and SpecificitySkullbeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesCalcium Phosphateshydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphateHydroxyapatitesBCPBeta-tricalcium phosphateBi-phasic calcium phosphateBone augmentationEpidural spaceHydroxyapatiteRabbitSinus floor elevation

Identifiers

PMID27906068
PMCPMC5134093
OpenAlexW2558162244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.