ArticleNature2016
Safikhani et al. reply.
Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multi-modal meta-analysis of cancer cell line omics profiles identifies ECHDC1 as a novel breast tumor suppressor.Molecular systems biology · 2021Pooled it
- Reassessing pharmacogenomic cell sensitivity with multilevel statistical models.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Patient-Derived In Vitro and In Vivo Models of Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Bayesian multi-source regression and monocyte-associated gene expression predict BCL-2 inhibitor resistance in acute myeloid leukemia.NPJ precision oncology · 2021Article
- Evaluating the consistency of large-scale pharmacogenomic studies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Article
- Predicting Synergism of Cancer Drug Combinations Using NCI-ALMANAC Data.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Article
- Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- PATRI, a Genomics Data Integration Tool for Biomarker Discovery.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Revisiting inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies.F1000Research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
27905430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.