Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27905399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cellular reactions to long-term volatile organic compound (VOC) exposures.

Johanna M Gostner, Johannes Zeisler, Mohammad Tauqeer Alam, Peter Gruber, Dietmar Fuchs, Kathrin Becker, Kerstin Neubert, Markus Kleinhappl, Stefan Martini, Florian Überall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. In vitro approaches to assess respiratory toxicity from volatile organic compounds: an in-depth review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lung cell toxicological effects of 3D printer aerosolized filament byproducts.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. PMEnvironmental research · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanna M GostnerDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes ZeislerDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Mohammad Tauqeer AlamDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.
Peter GruberDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Dietmar FuchsDivision of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Kathrin BeckerDivision of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Kerstin NeubertATLAS Biolabs GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Markus KleinhapplBioenergy 2020+, Graz, Austria.
Stefan MartiniBioenergy 2020+, Graz, Austria.
Florian ÜberallDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF T 703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of cellular processes initiated by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are limited when modelling realistic long-term exposure scenarios at low concentrations. Exposure to indoor VOCs is associated with a range of adverse effects, but data on molecular changes at regulatory threshold limits are lacking. Activity analysis of VOC in vitro can be a valuable complement to inhalation toxicological evaluations. We developed an exposure platform that generates a stable VOC atmosphere and allows the exposure of cells for longer periods. Using formaldehyde as a model analyte, air-liquid interface cultured A549 lung epithelial cells were exposed to critical concentrations of 0.1 and 0.5 ppm for 3 days. Owing to the lack of known exposure biomarkers, we applied a genome-wide transcriptional analysis to investigate cellular responses at these sublethal concentrations. We demonstrate a minor overlap of differentially expressed transcripts for both treatment concentrations, which can be further analyzed for their use as exposure biomarkers. Moreover, distinct expression patterns emerge for 0.1 and 0.5 ppm formaldehyde exposure, which is reflected in significant enrichment of distinct biological processes. More specifically, metabolism of specific compound classes, lipid biosynthesis and lung-associated functions are affected by lower exposure levels and processes affecting proliferation and apoptosis dominate the higher exposure levels.

Indexed as

Respiratory HypersensitivityA549 CellsAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorBiomarkersCell SurvivalEnvironmental ExposureFormaldehydeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansLipidsLungParticulate MatterTranscription, GeneticVolatile Organic CompoundsAir PollutantsBiomarkersFormaldehydeLipidsParticulate MatterVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID27905399
PMCPMC5131358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.