Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27905143›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Characterization of adverse drug reactions causing admission to an intensive care unit.

Camilo Rojas-Velandia, Jair Ruiz-Garzón, Juan-Carlos Moscoso-Alcina, Álvaro Vallejos-Narvaéz, Jenny Castro-Canoa, Yuri Bustos-Martínez, Max Flórez-Cutiva, Mabel Contreras-Muñoz, Jully-Carolina Gómez-Gil, Carlos-Alberto Calderón-Ospina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Patient harm from cardiovascular medications.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camilo Rojas-VelandiaClínicos IPS, Calle 39B N° 18A - 11, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Jair Ruiz-GarzónCafesalud EPS, Carrera 24 N° 72 - 92, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Juan-Carlos Moscoso-AlcinaHospital San Vicente de Paúl, Calle 4 N° 5 - 00, Fómeque (Cundinamarca), Colombia.
Álvaro Vallejos-NarvaézFaculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera 19 N° 8 - 32, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Jenny Castro-CanoaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 N° 63C - 69, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Yuri Bustos-MartínezSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 N° 63C - 69, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Max Flórez-CutivaCafesalud EPS, Carrera 24 N° 72 - 92, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Mabel Contreras-MuñozVirrey Solís IPS, Carrera 104 N°14 - 50, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Jully-Carolina Gómez-GilCafesalud EPS, Carrera 24 N° 72 - 92, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Carlos-Alberto Calderón-OspinaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 N° 63C - 69, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to determine the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that caused admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital.

methodsClinical records were reviewed for patients meeting the inclusion criteria who were admitted to the ICU between September and December 2012. Suspected cases of ADRs were documented. Nine researchers later evaluated causality using the Naranjo Algorithm, preventability using the Schumock and Thornton criteria, and clinical classification based on the dose-time-susceptibility system.

resultsIn total, 96 patients presented 108 cases of ADR (13.8%, 95% confidence interval 11.2-16.4%) as the cause of admission. The most frequent ADRs were bradyarrhythmias and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (12%). Therapeutic failure accounted for 20%. The most commonly associated medications were acetylsalicylic acid (16%) and losartan (10%). Forty-six cases were categorized as possible, and only one as definite. According to the dose-time-susceptibility classification, in 82% of the cases, the dosage was collateral (within the therapeutic range), and 90% were independent of time; the factors most associated with susceptibility to ADRs were comorbidities (42%) and age (49%). Forty-four percent of the ADRs were considered possibly preventable.

conclusionsADRs contribute significantly to ICU admissions, and a significant number of ADRs are preventable. National studies are needed to assess their incidence and to establish classification standards to reduce their clinical impact.

Indexed as

HospitalizationIntensive Care UnitsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung Adultdrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsintensive care unitspatient admissionspharmacovigilancepostmarketingproduct surveillance

Identifiers

PMID27905143
PMCPMC5401977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.