Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27905029›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2017

Risk factors and management for gastric stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm.

Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Hitoshi Kondo, Takeyoshi Minagawa, Ryoji Fujii, Kaho Sakata, Kenichi Inaba, Tomohiro Kimura, Hideyuki Ihara, Naohito Yoshizaki, Michiaki Hirayama and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Validity of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer Diagnosed as Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Before Treatment Regardless of Lesion Size.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetsuya SumiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan. t-sumiyoshi@tonan.gr.jp.
Hitoshi KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Takeyoshi MinagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Ryoji FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Kaho SakataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Kenichi InabaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Tomohiro KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Hideyuki IharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Naohito YoshizakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Michiaki HirayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Yumiko OyamadaDepartment of Pathology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Shunichi OkushibaDepartment of Surgery, Tonan Hospital, Kita 4, Nishi 7, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004, Japan.
Tonan Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a few studies have reported treatment options for stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for and evaluate the management of stenosis after ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasms in the cardia and antrum.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1218 patients (1447 gastric epithelial neoplasms) who underwent ESD at Tonan Hospital from June 2004 to November 2015. Post-ESD stenosis was defined when a standard endoscope could not be passed through the site.

resultsPost-ESD stenosis occurred in 10 (21.3%) of the 47 cardia cases and 14 (3.2%) of the 432 antrum cases. A wide resection of more than three fourths of the circumferential extent was the sole significant risk factor related to post-ESD stenosis in both cardia and antrum. Prophylactic endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) was performed in 3 of 10 patients with cardiac stenosis and 4 of 14 with antral stenosis. Post-EBD bleeding occurred in one cardia (10%) and one antrum (7.1%) case each and was endoscopically treated. Perforation during EBD occurred in two (14.3%) antrum cases, both of which required emergency open surgery. All complications were observed in patients with conventional EBD, and no complications were associated with prophylactic EBD.

conclusionsA wide resection of more than three fourths of the circumferential extent was the significant risk factor for post-ESD stenosis in both cardia and antrum, and prophylactic EBD could be a promising procedure for the management of post-ESD stenosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConstriction, PathologicEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach DiseasesStomach NeoplasmsEarly gastric cancerEndoscopic balloon dilation (EBD)Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)Gastric stenosisProphylactic endoscopic balloon dilation

Identifiers

PMID27905029
OpenAlexW2558769131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.