ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017
Multi-disciplinary Concurrent Management of Recurrent Hepatocellular Therapy is Superior to Sequential Therapy.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discontinuing Hepatitis Activity Reduced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Primary Curative Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Treatment stage migration and treatment sequences in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: drawbacks and opportunities.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an update.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Liver Resection Versus Embolization for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after a patient's initial therapy, whether it is transplantation, resection, or ablation, remains a challenging clinical problem. Since recurrence occurs in 70% of all initially treated disease within 5 years, optimal management to treat this recurrence is needed. Currently, a bias exists toward mono-therapy (i.e., ablation alone, hepatic arterial therapy alone, or sorafenib therapy alone) instead of concurrent sequential therapy-as is common in other primary and metastatic disease to the liver. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the overall survival of recurrent HCC based on either mono-therapy or multimodality therapy.
methodsA review of our prospective 2245 patient hepato-pancreatico-biliary database was performed for all patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma and had complete recurrence treatment data from June 2002 to May 2015. Mono-therapy was defined as initiation of a solitary therapy until disease progression or intolerance. Multimodality therapy was defined as at least 2 therapies that occurred simultaneously or within 4 weeks of each therapy.
resultsA total of 281 patients underwent treatment with curative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma, in which 192 experienced recurrence. These patients were treated with either thermal ablation or liver resection (LR) (N = 51), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radiation (N = 68), systemic therapy (N = 26), or multimodality therapy (N = 47). The extent of the first recurrence was similar in regard to the number of tumors (median 1), the type of radiologic HCC, gender, BMI, and percentage of liver involvement. They differed in regard to size (MMT largest, median 5.6 cm, p = 0.02), and MMT had higher Hepatitis C involvement (37% of patients, p = 0.001). In evaluation of first recurrence treatment, after a median follow-up of 24 months, multimodality therapy has a significant improvement in overall survival (median 40 months, range 8-85), when compared to LR/Ablation (27 months, range 4-75), TACE/XRT (13 months, range 4-68), and systemic (26 months, range 3-59) (p = 0.003).
conclusionMultimodality therapy should be considered in all patients with recurrent HCC based on tumor biology and underlying hepatic reserve. Hepatocellular cancer should be treated like other hepatic malignancies in which concurrent therapies are utilized simultaneously to optimize oncologic effects (response rates and overall survival) and minimize quality-of-life side effects. Multimodality therapy can lead to far superior overall survival and is well tolerated in the majority of recurrent HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.