ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017
Minimal Excision and Primary Suture is a Cost-Efficient Definitive Treatment for Pilonidal Disease with Low Morbidity: A Population-Based Interventional and a Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Guideline
- Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Outcomes of minimally invasive pit-picking treatment in adolescents with uncomplicated pilonidal disease: a retrospective single-center study.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Practice patterns of paediatric surgeons on treating pilonidal sinus disease - a national survey study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in Norway: training, attitudes and preferences-a survey among Norwegian surgeons.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Benign Anorectal Disorder Management in Low-Resource Settings.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022Review
- Pilonidal sinus disease on the rise: a one-third incidence increase in inpatients in 13 years with substantial regional variation in Germany.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Pilonidal sinus disease: Review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Review
- Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates.Cureus · 2018Article
- Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review of Cost Analyses in the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Are Naval Mines Relevant?World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Treating Pilonidal Disease: You Do Not Need to Detonate a Naval Mine to Catch a Fish.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional treatment of pilonidal disease with wide excision is associated with high morbidity. We describe the short- and long-term results and the impact on the health care system of a simple operation performed in the office under local anaesthesia, consisting of minimal excision of pilonidal sinuses with primary suture-the modified Lord-Millar operation (mLM).
methodsAll patients operated with mLM from February 2008 till November 2012 were prospectively followed for recurrence by telephone interviews and examination of symptomatic patients till July 2015. The outcome is compared with that in all patients operated with conventional wide excision from January 2003 till February 2008. The effects on the health care system of a consistent use of mLM is analysed by comparing the management of all patients with pilonidal disease at three hospitals during 2013 and 2014.
resultsSome 129 patients underwent conventional surgical treatment, and 113 had the mLM operation. The mLM operation was more often performed under local anaesthesia, was less often admitted to hospital, had fewer post-operative health care visits (2.4 vs. 14.6, p < 0.001) and a shorter sick leave (1.0 vs. 34.7 days, p < 0.001) indicating faster wound healing. The estimated 5-year recurrence rate was similar (32 vs. 23%, p = 0.091). The cost per operated patient was lower (2231 vs. 6222 EUR, p < 0.001). The hospital consistently applying the mLM operation used less resources for pilonidal diseased patients (34,545 vs. 77,421 EUR per 100,000 inhabitants and year).
conclusionsThe mLM operation is simple, cost-efficient and has low morbidity and good long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.