ArticleMolecular diversity2017
Computer modeling in predicting the bioactivity of human 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5-Lipoxygenase (5-LOX) is a key enzyme in the inflammatory path. Inhibitors of 5-LOX are useful for the treatment of diseases like arthritis, cancer, and asthma. We have collected a dataset including 220 human 5-LOX inhibitors for classification. A self-organizing map (SOM), a support vector machine (SVM), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm were used to build models with selected descriptors for classifying 5-LOX inhibitors into active and weakly active ones. MACCS fingerprints were used in this model building process. The accuracy (Q) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of the best SOM model (Model 1A) were 86.49% and 0.73 on the test set, respectively. The Q and MCC of the best SVM model (Model 2A) were 82.67% and 0.64 on the test set, respectively. The Q and MCC of the best MLP model (Model 3B) were 84.00% and 0.67 on the test set, respectively. In addition, 180 inhibitors with bioactivities measured by fluorescence method were further used for a quantitative prediction. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and SVM algorithms were used to build models to predict the [Formula: see text] values. The correlation coefficients (R) of the MLR model (Model Q1) and the SVM model (Model Q2) were 0.72 and 0.74 on the test set, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.