ReviewGastrointestinal tumors2016
Risk Factors for Barrett's Oesophagus.
Review in Gastrointestinal tumors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional dyspepsia and risk of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia: A propensity-matched multicenter retrospective cohort study.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Associations Between Non-Genetic Risk Factors and DNA Methylation Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Its Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Increased Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus in Taiwan: A Prospective Multicenter Study.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Gender disparities and woman-specific trends in Barrett's esophagus in the United States: An 11-year nationwide population-based study.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Risk factors of erosive esophagitis and barrett's esophagus in patients with reflux symptoms.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- Lifestyle Risk Factors, Quality of Life, and Intervention Preferences of Barrett's Esophagus Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Global advances in health and medicine · 2021Article
- Genome-wide tracts of homozygosity and exome analyses reveal repetitive elements with Barrets esophagus/esophageal adenocarcinoma risk.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- High prevalence of esophagitis in patients with severe ineffective esophageal motility: need for a new diagnostic cutoff.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBarrett's oesophagus (BO) is a premalignant condition associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Globally, the incidence of OAC is rising. Furthermore, the prognosis regarding the morbidity and mortality of OAC is bleak, with an estimated 5-year survival of 10-15%. Hence, detection of the premalignant phase is paramount. Endoscopy and biopsy sampling is the mainstay of diagnosis. Patients may present with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or be completely asymptomatic. Therefore, symptomatology alone is a poor indicator of this condition. SUMMARY: This review highlights the current risk factors associated with the development of BO. KEY MESSAGE: Primary risk factors for BO include male gender, increased age, a family history of the disease, long-standing GORD, smoking, obesity (specifically determined by the waist-to-hip ratio as opposed to BMI), and Caucasian race. Alcohol consumption and PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: By ensuring an appropriate understanding of the risk factors, clinicians can discern at-risk patients for endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.