ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2016
Detection of gene copy number alterations in DCIS and invasive breast cancer by QM-FISH.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gain of TPPP as a predictor of progression in patients with bladder cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Biomarkers in a Precision Medicine Era: Current and Future Molecular-Based Testing.The American journal of pathology · 2019Review
- Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2018Review
- Diversity index as a novel prognostic factor in breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Pathological significance of MAD2L1 in breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study and meta analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exact roles of copy number alteration (CNA) in initiation, progression and immunotherapy of breast cancer and the genomic alterations behind progression from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive carcinoma remain unknown. Quantitative multi-gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (QM-FISH) opens a possibility of large scale genomic analysis of specific deletions and amplifications with high-resolution at one cell level. We detected CNAs of 30 genes using QM-FISH and analyzed their association with clinicopathological parameters and patients' outcomes in 66 breast cancers with synchronous invasive carcinoma and DCIS. The copy numbers of 30 genes in DCIS and the invasive area in all tumors were compared. The results revealed some recurrent CNAs including amplifications of MDMx, CCNE2, HER2 and deletions in Chek1, p53, Rb1 with a frequency of over 20%. By comparing the CNAs in invasive tumors and co-occurring DCIS, the similarity of chromosomal instability (CIN) in both components was visualized. Some co-occurrence patterns of CNAs of 30 genes were observed. The study also demonstrated higher frequencies of occurrence of CNAs in aneuploidy tumors, high grade tumors and tumors with high proliferation index. Higher CNAs were also found in death patients. Overall, we uncovered some frequently occurring gene aberrations out of 30 genes and synchronous pre-invasive lesions share majority of CNAs with invasive breast cancer. Moreover QM-FISH is a powerful technique to detect CNAs of multi-genes and give more information on co-occurrence of CNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27904700PMC5126342W2562388591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.