Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27904139›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2017

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in untreated AL amyloidosis has an independent prognostic impact by abnormality type and treatment category.

E Muchtar, A Dispenzieri, S K Kumar, R P Ketterling, D Dingli, M Q Lacy, F K Buadi, S R Hayman, P Kapoor, N Leung and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The molecular landscape of AL amyloidosis.British journal of haematology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Diagnosis and Risk Assessment.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E MuchtarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S K KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R P KetterlingCytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
D DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Q LacyDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
F K BuadiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S R HaymanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
P KapoorDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
N LeungDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-1411
R ChakrabortyDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
W GonsalvesDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R WarsameDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
T V KourelisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S RussellDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J A LustDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Y LinDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R S GoDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S ZeldenrustDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R A KyleDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S V RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USEssentia Health · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) by regimen type was assessed in 692 immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis patients with iFISH at diagnosis. First-line treatment was categorized as stem cell transplant and three non-transplant regimens. The most common abnormality was t(11;14) (49% of patients) followed by monosomy 13/del(13q) (36%) and trisomies (26%). A lower rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better was observed in patients with t(11;14) treated with bortezomib-based (52% vs 77%; P=0.004) and IMiD-based regimens (13% vs 54%; P=0.04) compared with those lacking t(11;14). This corresponded to an inferior overall survival (OS) in t(11;14)-positive bortezomib-treated (median 15 vs 27 months; P=0.05) and IMiD-treated patients (median 12 vs 32 months; P=0.05). The inferior OS associated with t(11;14) bortezomib-treated patients was restricted to patients with favorable disease. Trisomies were associated with a shorter OS (median 29 vs 69 months; P=0.001), reaching statistical significance only for melphalan (median 15 vs 32 months; P=0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent survival impact for trisomies in the entire cohort and for t(11;14) among bortezomib-treated patients. iFISH is prognostic in untreated AL amyloidosis and may influence treatment selection. Patients with t(11;14) should be considered for ASCT or standard-dose melphalan at diagnosis because the survival disadvantage may be abrogated.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14InterphaseTranslocation, GeneticAgedAmyloidosisFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTrisomy

Identifiers

PMID27904139
OpenAlexW2558108790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.