Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27904032›Full record

ReviewCirculation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society2016

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction - Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Risk Factors and Therapy.

Cheng Chen, Janet Wei, Ahmed AlBadri, Parham Zarrini, C Noel Bairey Merz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheng ChenBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
Janet Wei
Ahmed AlBadri
Parham Zarrini
C Noel Bairey Merz

Funding

ZONA-FREE HAMSTER OVA ASSAY AS AN INDICATOR OF MALE FERTILITYM01RR000425 · NCRR · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GAIL V · 1985 to 2011
$74.2M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Women's Ischemia Syndrome EvaluationU01HL064829 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KELSEY, SHERYL F. · 2001 to 2005
$3.9M
Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Coronary Vascular DysfunctionR01HL090957 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAIREY MERZ, CATHLEEN NOEL, PEPINE, CARL J · 2008 to 2013
$3.5M
Behavioral Medicine and Cardiovascular Research TrainingT32HL069751 · NHLBI · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI KRANTZ, DAVID S. · 2003 to 2007
$1.2M
Cardiac Autonomic Function in WomenK23HL105787 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MEHTA, PUJA KIRAN · 2012 to 2016
$813k
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN--CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068163 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PEPINE, CARL J · 1996 to 2001
$386k
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068161 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROGERS, WILLIAM J · 1996 to 2000
$245k
Cardiovascular Events in Women's Ischemia Syndrome EvaluationR03AG032631 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KELSEY, SHERYL F · 2008 to 2009
$137k
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTRN01HV068164 · HV · ALLEGHENY-SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REICHEK, NATHANIEL · 1996 to 2001
–
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTR-N01HV68162-268068162N01HV068162 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1996 to 2005
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000425NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL105787NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068161NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068162NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068163NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090957NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069751NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL064829NIA NIH HHS R03 AG032631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angina has traditionally been thought to be caused by obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a substantial number of patients with angina are found to not have obstructive CAD when undergoing coronary angiography. A significant proportion of these patients have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by heightened sensitivity to vasoconstrictor stimuli and limited microvascular vasodilator capacity. With the advent of non-invasive and invasive techniques, the coronary microvasculature has been more extensively studied in the past 2 decades. CMD has been identified as a cause of cardiac ischemia, in addition to traditional atherosclerotic disease and vasospastic disease. CMD can occur alone or in the presence obstructive CAD. CMD shares many similar risk factors with macrovascular CAD. Diagnosis is achieved through detection of an attenuated response of coronary blood flow in response to vasodilatory agents. Imaging modalities such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography have become more widely used, but have not yet completely replaced the traditional intracoronary vasoreactivity testing. Treatment of CMD starts with lifestyle modification and risk factor control. The use of traditional antianginal, antiatherosclerotic medications and some novel agents may be beneficial; however, clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapeutic modalities. In addition, studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to determine the prognostic benefits of these agents. We review the epidemiology, prognosis, pathogenesis, diagnosis, risk factors and current therapies for CMD.

Indexed as

Angina PectorisCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationMicrocirculationVasoconstrictionAnimalsHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27904032
PMCPMC8607842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.