Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27903842›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies2017

A Comprehensive Lifestyle Randomized Clinical Trial: Design and Initial Patient Experience.

Banu Arun, Taylor Austin, Gildy V Babiera, Karen Basen-Engquist, Cindy L Carmack, Alejandro Chaoul, Lorenzo Cohen, Lisa Connelly, Robin Haddad, Carol Harrison and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Multidisciplinary lifestyle modification program (IM-FIT) for cancer survivors: implementation of a reimbursable model in a cancer hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epidemiology and biology of physical activity and cancer recurrence.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Banu Arun1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Taylor Austin1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gildy V Babiera1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Karen Basen-Engquist1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cindy L Carmack1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alejandro Chaoul1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lorenzo Cohen1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lisa Connelly1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robin Haddad1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Carol Harrison1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yisheng Li1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Smitha Mallaiah1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Raghuram Nagarathna2 Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, India.
Patricia A Parker1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
George H Perkins1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
James M Reuben1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ya-Chen Tina Shih1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Amy Spelman1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Anil Sood1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peiying Yang1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sai-Ching J Yeung1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough epidemiological research demonstrates that there is an association between lifestyle factors and risk of breast cancer recurrence, progression of disease, and mortality, no comprehensive lifestyle change clinical trials have been conducted to determine if changing multiple risk factors leads to changes in biobehavioral processes and clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer. This article describes the design, feasibility, adherence to the intervention and data collection, and patient experience of a comprehensive lifestyle change clinical trial (CompLife).

methodsCompLife is a randomized, controlled trial of a multiple-behavior intervention focusing on diet, exercise, and mind-body practice along with behavioral counseling to support change. The initial exposure to the intervention takes place during the 4 to 6 weeks of radiotherapy (XRT) for women with stage III breast cancer and then across the subsequent 12 months. The intervention group will have 42 hours of in-person lifestyle counseling during XRT (7-10 hours a week) followed by up to 30 hours of counseling via video connection for the subsequent 12 months (weekly sessions for 6 months and then monthly for 6 months). The primary outcome is disease-free survival. Multiple secondary outcomes are being evaluated, including: (1) biological pathways; (2) overall survival; (3) patient-reported outcomes; (4) dietary patterns/fitness levels, anthropometrics, and body composition; and (5) economic outcomes. Qualitative data of the patient experience in the trial is collected from exit interviews, concluding remarks, direct email correspondences, and web postings from patients.

resultsFifty-five patients have been recruited and randomized to the trial to date. Accrual of eligible patients is high (72%) and dropout rates extremely low (5%). Attendance to the in-person sessions is high (95% attending greater than 80% of sessions) as well as to the 30 hours of video counseling (88% attending more than 70% of sessions). Adherence to components of the behavior change intervention is high and compliance with the intensive amount of data collection is exceptional. Qualitative data collected from the participants reveals testimonials supporting the importance of the comprehensive nature of intervention, especially the mind-body/mindfulness component and social support, and meaningful lifestyle transformations.

conclusionConducting a comprehensive, multicomponent, lifestyle change clinical trial for women with breast was feasible and collection of biobehavioral outcomes successful. Adherence to behavior change was high and patient experience was overwhelmingly positive.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCounselingDietDisease-Free SurvivalExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient Compliancebreastcancercomprehensiveexperienceintegrativelifestylepatient

Identifiers

PMID27903842
PMCPMC5558265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.