Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27903793›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2017

The serotonin 5-HT

Clinton E Canal, Kevin S Murnane

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ACS omega · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 5-HTMolecular psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A narrative synthesis of research with 5-MeO-DMT.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clinton E Canal1 Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, USA.
Kevin S Murnane2 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mercer University College of Pharmacy, Mercer University Health Sciences Center, Atlanta, USA.
Mercer University Health Sciences Center · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Receptor pharmacology and toxicology of second-generation pyrrolidine "bath salt" cathinonesR21DA040907 · NIDA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CANAL, CLINTON E, MURNANE, KEVIN SEAN · 2016 to 2017
$493k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic hallucinogens share pharmacology as serotonin 5-HT

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCocaineHallucinogensHumansNucleus AccumbensReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CSerotoninSerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AgonistsVentral Tegmental AreaCocaineHallucinogensReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CSerotoninSerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Agonists5-HT2CaddictioncocaineHallucinogensKv1

Identifiers

PMID27903793
PMCPMC5445387
OpenAlexW2551733333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.