Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27903257›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

What do antenatal care providers understand and do about oral health care during pregnancy: a cross-sectional survey in New South Wales, Australia.

Ajesh George, Hannah G Dahlen, Jennifer Reath, Shilpi Ajwani, Sameer Bhole, Andrew Korda, Harrison Ng Chok, Charmaine Miranda, Amy Villarosa, Maree Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oral health protection and restorative approaches in the puerperal period.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Oral Health Literacy and Patient Education Practices Among Non-Dental Professionals in Chongqing, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ajesh GeorgeCollaboration for Oral Health Outcomes, Research Translation and Evaluation (COHORTE) Research Group, Western Sydney University, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research,University of Sydney, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool, 1871, Australia. a.george@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6795-2546
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research, Parramatta, 2150, Australia.
Jennifer ReathPeter Brennan Chair of General Practice, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, 2150, Australia.
Shilpi AjwaniSydney Local Health District Oral Health Services, Sydney Dental Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2010, Australia.
Sameer BholeSydney Local Health District Oral Health Services, Sydney Dental Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2010, Australia.
Andrew KordaObstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, 2150, Australia.
Harrison Ng ChokCentre for Nursing Research and Practice Development, Western Sydney University, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, 2751, Australia.
Charmaine MirandaCollege of Professional Psychology, Crows Nest, 2065, Australia.
Amy VillarosaCOHORTE Research Group, Western Sydney University, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, 1871, Australia.
Maree JohnsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research, Sydney, 2060, Australia.
Ingham Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is mounting evidence to support the lack of awareness among pregnant women about health consequences and long term risks associated with poor oral hygiene during pregnancy. A recognised and important point of influence is their interaction with health professionals, particularly when receiving Antenatal Care. However, there is limited evidence about the perceptions of ANC providers in Australia toward the provision of perinatal oral healthcare. This study was undertaken to explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Antenatal Care (ANC) providers in New South Wales (NSW), Australia providing perinatal oral healthcare and to identify barriers to and predictors of their practices in this area.

methodsA cross sectional survey was undertaken of ANC providers (general practitioners, obstetricians/gynaecologists and midwives) practising in NSW, Australia. Participants were recruited through their professional organisations via email, postal mail, and networking at conferences. The survey addressed the domains of knowledge, attitude, barriers and practices towards oral healthcare, along with demographics. Data was entered into SPSS software and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

resultsA total of 393 surveys (17.6% response rate) were completed comprising 124 general practitioners, 74 obstetricians/gynaecologists and 195 midwives. The results showed limited knowledge among ANC providers regarding the impact of poor maternal oral health on pregnancy/infant outcomes. Most (99%) participants agreed that maternal oral health was important yet few were discussing the importance of oral health or advising women to visit a dentist (16.4-21.5%). Further, less than a third felt they had the skills to provide oral health advice during pregnancy. ANC providers who were more knowledgeable about maternal oral health, had training and information in this area and greater experience, were more likely to engage in practices addressing the oral health of pregnant women.

conclusionThe findings suggest that ANC providers in NSW are not focussing on oral health with pregnant women. ANC providers seem willing to discuss oral health if they have appropriate education/training and information in this area. Further research at a national level is required to confirm whether these findings are similar in all Australian states.

Indexed as

GynecologyMidwiferyObstetricsOral HealthPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prenatal CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesDirective CounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesAntenatalAntenatal careDentistsOral healthPerinatalPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID27903257
PMCPMC5131399
OpenAlexW2558968838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.