Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27903256›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Revealing hidden species diversity in closely related species using nuclear SNPs, SSRs and DNA sequences - a case study in the tree genus Milicia.

Kasso Daïnou, Céline Blanc-Jolivet, Bernd Degen, Priscilla Kimani, Dyana Ndiade-Bourobou, Armel S L Donkpegan, Félicien Tosso, Esra Kaymak, Nils Bourland, Jean-Louis Doucet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Candidate Genes for the High-Altitude Adaptations of Two Mountain Pine Taxa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Kasso DaïnouNature + asbl / TERRA Research Centre, Central African Forests, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium. k.dainou@natureplus.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2486-1895
Céline Blanc-JolivetThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Bernd DegenThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstrasse 2, 22927, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Priscilla KimaniKenya Forestry Research Institute, Biotechnology Section, P. O. Box 20412-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dyana Ndiade-BourobouIRAF/CENAREST, BP 842 Gros-bouquet, Libreville, Gabon.
Armel S L DonkpeganTERRA Research Centre, Central African Forests, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Félicien TossoTERRA Research Centre, Central African Forests, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Esra KaymakEvolutionary Biology and Ecology - CP 160⁄12, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Nils BourlandService of Wood Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium.
Jean-Louis DoucetTERRA Research Centre, Central African Forests, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Olivier J HardyEvolutionary Biology and Ecology - CP 160⁄12, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEJohann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEInstitut Africain d'Informatique · GAKenya Forestry Research Institute · KERoyal Museum for Central Africa · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecies delimitation in closely related plant taxa can be challenging because (i) reproductive barriers are not always congruent with morphological differentiation, (ii) use of plastid sequences might lead to misinterpretation, (iii) rare species might not be sampled. We revisited molecular-based species delimitation in the African genus Milicia, currently divided into M. regia (West Africa) and M. excelsa (from West to East Africa). We used 435 samples collected in West, Central and East Africa. We genotyped SNP and SSR loci to identify genetic clusters, and sequenced two plastid regions (psbA-trnH, trnC-ycf6) and a nuclear gene (At103) to confirm species' divergence and compare species delimitation methods. We also examined whether ecological niche differentiation was congruent with sampled genetic structure.

resultsWest African M. regia, West African and East African M. excelsa samples constituted three well distinct genetic clusters according to SNPs and SSRs. In Central Africa, two genetic clusters were consistently inferred by both types of markers, while a few scattered samples, sympatric with the preceding clusters but exhibiting leaf traits of M. regia, were grouped with the West African M. regia cluster based on SNPs or formed a distinct cluster based on SSRs. SSR results were confirmed by sequence data from the nuclear region At103 which revealed three distinct 'Fields For Recombination' corresponding to (i) West African M. regia, (ii) Central African samples with leaf traits of M. regia, and (iii) all M. excelsa samples. None of the plastid sequences provide indication of distinct clades of the three species-like units. Niche modelling techniques yielded a significant correlation between niche overlap and genetic distance.

conclusionsOur genetic data suggest that three species of Milicia could be recognized. It is surprising that the occurrence of two species in Central Africa was not reported for this well-known timber tree. Globally, our work highlights the importance of collecting samples in a systematic way and the need for combining different nuclear markers when dealing with species complexes. Recognizing cryptic species is particularly crucial for economically exploited species because some hidden taxa might actually be endangered as they are merged with more abundant species.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAfrica, CentralAfrica, EasternAfrica, WesternGenetic StructuresGenotypeMultigene FamilyPhylogenyRosalesSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificitySympatryTreesDNA, PlantCryptic speciesDNA sequencesMicrosatellitesMiliciaSNPSpecies delimitationTropical forests

Identifiers

PMID27903256
PMCPMC5131513
OpenAlexW2558904821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.