Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27903244›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2016

Cryopreservation of dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes in hydroxyethyl starch-based cryoprotectants.

Yahaira Naaldijk, Adiv A Johnson, Annett Friedrich-Stöckigt, Alexandra Stolzing

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cryopreservation of NK and T Cells Without DMSO for Adoptive Cell-Based Immunotherapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yahaira NaaldijkFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Adiv A JohnsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Annett Friedrich-StöckigtFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexandra StolzingFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany. A.Stolzing@lboro.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-5736
Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DELoughborough University · GBMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreservation of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes is essential for the creation of skin tissue banks. For successful cryopreservation of cells, selection of an appropriate cryoprotectant agent (CPA) is imperative. The aim of this study was to identify CPAs that minimize toxic effects and allow for the preservation of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes in suspension and in monolayers.

resultsWe cryopreserved human fibroblasts and keratinocytes with different CPAs and compared them to fresh, unfrozen cells. Cells were frozen in the presence and absence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), the latter of which is a commonly used CPA known to exert toxic effects on cells. Cell numbers were counted immediately post-thaw as well as three days after thawing. Cellular structures were analyzed and counted by labeling nuclei, mitochondria, and actin filaments. We found that successful cryopreservation of suspended or adherent keratinocytes can be accomplished with a 10% HES or a 5% HES, 5% DMSO solution. Cell viability of fibroblasts cryopreserved in suspension was maintained with 10% HES or 5% HES, 5% DMSO solutions. Adherent, cryopreserved fibroblasts were successfully maintained with a 5% HES, 5% DMSO solution.

conclusionWe conclude that skin tissue cells can be effectively cryopreserved by substituting all or a portion of DMSO with HES. Given that DMSO is the most commonly used CPA and is believed to be more toxic than HES, these findings are of clinical significance for tissue-based replacement therapies. Therapies that require the use of keratinocyte and fibroblast cells, such as those aimed at treating skin wounds or skin burns, may be optimized by substituting a portion or all of DMSO with HES during cryopreservation protocols.

Indexed as

Cell LineCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFibroblastsHumansHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesKeratinocytesMaleSkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaCryoprotective AgentsHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesCryopreservationCryoprotectantsDimethyl sulfoxideFibroblastsHydroxyethyl starchKeratinocytes

Identifiers

PMID27903244
PMCPMC5131400
OpenAlexW2558446358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.