Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27902693›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Long-Term Benefits of Increased Aspirin Use by At-Risk Americans Aged 50 and Older.

David B Agus, Étienne Gaudette, Dana P Goldman, Andrew Messali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The urban-rural gap in older Americans' healthy life expectancy.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PCSK9 Inhibitors Show Value for Patients and the US Health Care System.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2017
    Article
  6. Effect of Health-Promoting Agents on Exclusion-Zone Size.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David B AgusLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Viterbi School of Engineering, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.
Étienne GaudetteSchaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California Price School and School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Dana P GoldmanSchaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California Price School and School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Andrew MessaliAnalysis Group, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

USC-Yale Roybal Center for Behavioral Interventions in AgingP30AG024968 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JASON N. DOCTOR · 2004 to 2026
$14.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe usefulness of aspirin to defend against cardiovascular disease in both primary and secondary settings is well recognized by the medical profession. Multiple studies also have found that daily aspirin significantly reduces cancer incidence and mortality. Despite these proven health benefits, aspirin use remains low among populations targeted by cardiovascular prevention guidelines. This article seeks to determine the long-term economic and population-health impact of broader use of aspirin by older Americans at higher risk for cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND

findingsWe employ the Future Elderly Model, a dynamic microsimulation that follows Americans aged 50 and older, to project their lifetime health and spending under the status quo and in various scenarios of expanded aspirin use. The model is based primarily on data from the Health and Retirement Study, a large, representative, national survey that has been ongoing for more than two decades. Outcomes are chosen to provide a broad perspective of the individual and societal impacts of the interventions and include: heart disease, stroke, cancer, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, disability-free life expectancy, and medical costs. Eligibility for increased aspirin use in simulations is based on the 2011-2012 questionnaire on preventive aspirin use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. These data reveal a large unmet need for daily aspirin, with over 40% of men and 10% of women aged 50 to 79 presenting high cardiovascular risk but not taking aspirin. We estimate that increased use by high-risk older Americans would improve national life expectancy at age 50 by 0.28 years (95% CI 0.08-0.50) and would add 900,000 people (95% CI 300,000-1,400,000) to the American population by 2036. After valuing the quality-adjusted life-years appropriately, Americans could expect $692 billion (95% CI 345-975) in net health benefits over that period.

conclusionsExpanded use of aspirin by older Americans with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease could generate substantial population health benefits over the next twenty years and do so very cost-effectively.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirin

Identifiers

PMID27902693
PMCPMC5130201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.